PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYTI vs. MLPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYTI vs. MLPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYTI achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD's 5.38% return.


HYTI

1D
-0.65%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.77%
1Y
6.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MLPD

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.29%
YTD
5.38%
6M
6.27%
1Y
15.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYTI vs. MLPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYTI and MLPD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.19

The correlation between HYTI and MLPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYTI vs. MLPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

MLPD
MLPD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MLPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLPD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MLPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLPD Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYTI vs. MLPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYTIMLPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.40

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

3.27

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.33

10.64

+0.69

HYTI vs. MLPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYTI Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the MLPD Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYTI and MLPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYTIMLPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

2.11

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.21

1.15

+0.07

Drawdowns

HYTI vs. MLPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYTI drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum MLPD drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTI and MLPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYTIMLPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.47%

-12.90%

+8.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.38%

-4.80%

+2.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-1.61%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-1.12%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.47%

-0.91%

Volatility

HYTI vs. MLPD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) is 1.27%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that HYTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYTIMLPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

3.08%

-1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

5.41%

-2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

7.44%

-3.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.23%

11.40%

-6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

11.40%

-6.17%

HYTI vs. MLPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYTI vs. MLPD - Dividend Comparison

HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, less than MLPD's 13.42% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


HYTI and MLPD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLPD has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to HYTI (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTI dropped -4.47% vs MLPD's -12.90%.

On 1-year performance, MLPD leads with 15.27% vs 6.41% for HYTI. On fees, MLPD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MLPD has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MLPD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYTI.

MLPD has the higher dividend yield at 13.42%, compared with 10.46% for HYTI.

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYTI and 0.60% for MLPD.

MLPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYTI and MLPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer