HYTI vs. MLPD
HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) and MLPD (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. HYTI is actively managed, while MLPD is passively managed. Over the past year, HYTI returned 6.41% vs 15.27% for MLPD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for MLPD.
Performance
HYTI vs. MLPD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYTI achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than MLPD's 5.38% return.
HYTI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLPD
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 5.38%
- 6M
- 6.27%
- 1Y
- 15.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI vs. MLPD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 1.24% | 7.01% |
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF | 5.38% | 12.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYTI and MLPD is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HYTI and MLPD shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYTI vs. MLPD — Risk / Return Rank
HYTI
MLPD
HYTI vs. MLPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYTI | MLPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.40 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.27 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | 10.64 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYTI | MLPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.11 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 1.15 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
HYTI vs. MLPD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYTI drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum MLPD drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTI and MLPD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYTI | MLPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -12.90% | +8.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -4.80% | +2.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -1.61% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -1.12% | +0.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 1.47% | -0.91% |
Volatility
HYTI vs. MLPD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) is 1.27%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF (MLPD) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that HYTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYTI | MLPD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 3.08% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | 5.41% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 7.44% | -3.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 11.40% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 11.40% | -6.17% |
HYTI vs. MLPD - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYTI vs. MLPD - Dividend Comparison
HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, less than MLPD's 13.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.46% | 8.10% | 0.00% |
MLPD Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF | 13.42% | 13.45% | 6.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYTI and MLPD have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPD has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to HYTI (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYTI dropped -4.47% vs MLPD's -12.90%.
On 1-year performance, MLPD leads with 15.27% vs 6.41% for HYTI. On fees, MLPD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MLPD has performed better with a 15.27% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYTI.
MLPD has the higher dividend yield at 13.42%, compared with 10.46% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYTI and 0.60% for MLPD.
MLPD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYTI and MLPD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer