HYTI vs. BRKC
HYTI (FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF) and BRKC (YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYTI returned 6.41% vs -2.51% for BRKC. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BRKC.
Performance
HYTI vs. BRKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYTI achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than BRKC's -2.19% return.
HYTI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 6.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BRKC
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -2.43%
- 1Y
- -2.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYTI vs. BRKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 1.24% | 5.04% |
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | -2.19% | 0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYTI and BRKC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYTI vs. BRKC — Risk / Return Rank
HYTI
BRKC
HYTI vs. BRKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) and YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF (BRKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYTI | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYTI | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | -0.10 | +1.32 |
Drawdowns
HYTI vs. BRKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYTI drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum BRKC drawdown of -7.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYTI and BRKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYTI | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -7.59% | +3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.38% | -7.59% | +5.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -4.16% | +3.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.46% | -3.13% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | — | — |
Volatility
HYTI vs. BRKC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYTI | BRKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 12.68% | -8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 12.68% | -7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.23% | 12.68% | -7.45% |
HYTI vs. BRKC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than BRKC's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYTI vs. BRKC - Dividend Comparison
HYTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.46%, less than BRKC's 20.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BRKC YieldMax BRK.B Option Income Strategy ETF | 20.33% | 10.81% |
HYTI FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF | 10.46% | 8.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYTI and BRKC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, HYTI leads with 6.41% vs -2.51% for BRKC. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYTI has performed better with a 6.41% return vs -2.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BRKC.
BRKC has the higher dividend yield at 20.33%, compared with 10.46% for HYTI.
They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYTI and 0.99% for BRKC.
Find the right allocation for HYTI and BRKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer