HYSZX vs. PRCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX).
HYSZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Oct 26, 2012. PRCPX is a passively managed fund by T. Rowe Price that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US High-Yield 2% Issuer Capped Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 29, 2014.
Performance
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYSZX PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund | -0.70% | 7.84% | 6.49% | 9.57% | -6.46% | 5.48% | 4.19% | 11.78% | 1.20% | 4.80% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 0.37% | 14.80% | 7.46% | 14.90% | -10.50% | 6.36% | 5.55% | 13.77% | -1.44% | 6.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYSZX achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than PRCPX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, HYSZX has underperformed PRCPX with an annualized return of 4.90%, while PRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.88% annualized return.
HYSZX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- 1Y
- 5.26%
- 3Y*
- 6.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.86%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
PRCPX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.12%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 6.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYSZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCPX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HYSZX vs. PRCPX — Risk / Return Rank
HYSZX
PRCPX
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYSZX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 3.49 | -1.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 5.55 | -2.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.93 | -0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 4.86 | -2.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.13 | 22.46 | -12.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYSZX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 3.49 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 1.24 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.17 | 1.27 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | 0.88 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between HYSZX and PRCPX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Dividend Comparison
HYSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, less than PRCPX's 12.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYSZX PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund | 5.93% | 6.45% | 6.27% | 4.84% | 5.01% | 4.56% | 5.00% | 5.60% | 5.94% | 5.73% | 6.33% | 6.76% |
PRCPX T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund | 12.83% | 12.19% | 7.03% | 7.88% | 4.89% | 5.11% | 5.36% | 5.18% | 5.72% | 4.95% | 5.88% | 7.58% |
Drawdowns
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYSZX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum PRCPX drawdown of -23.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSZX and PRCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYSZX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -23.07% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.39% | -3.03% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.77% | -14.34% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.31% | -23.07% | +4.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.42% | -1.24% | -0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -3.16% | +1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.58% | 0.66% | -0.08% |
Volatility
HYSZX vs. PRCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) is 1.11%, while T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund (PRCPX) has a volatility of 1.24%. This indicates that HYSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HYSZX | PRCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 1.24% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.94% | 2.48% | -0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10% | 4.12% | -1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 4.79% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.21% | 5.45% | -1.24% |