HYSZX vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HYSZX (PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, HYSZX returned 4.88%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYSZX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSZX achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.88% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HYSZX having a 4.88% annualized return and FLRT not far ahead at 4.91%.

HYSZX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 1.37%
• 6M: 2.02%
• 1Y: 5.54%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: 4.05%
• 10Y*: 4.88%

FLRT

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 5.70%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.97%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HYSZX PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund	1.37%	7.84%	6.49%	9.57%	-6.46%	5.48%	4.19%	11.78%	1.20%	4.80%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.88%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	-2.72%	3.18%	2.78%	9.44%	-1.14%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSZX and FLRT is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2015	0.25

The correlation between HYSZX and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HYSZX vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSZX

HYSZX Risk / Return Rank: 68
HYSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
HYSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
HYSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HYSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HYSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 84
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYSZX	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	3.59	-1.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.51	5.55	-2.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.85	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.76	3.22	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.20	11.76	+1.43

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSZX and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSZX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSZX and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYSZX	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.31%	-20.96%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.01%	-1.78%	-0.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.82%	-2.87%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.77%	-7.60%	-2.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.31%	-20.96%	+2.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.11%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-1.41%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.49%	-0.07%

Volatility

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) has a higher volatility of 0.89% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.43%. This indicates that HYSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYSZX	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.89%	0.43%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.24%	1.22%	+1.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.87%	1.60%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.88%	2.30%	+1.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.23%	6.12%	-1.89%

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYSZX vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

HYSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than FLRT's 6.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.80%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
HYSZX PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund	6.39%	6.45%	6.27%	4.84%	5.01%	4.56%	5.00%	5.60%	5.94%	5.73%	6.33%	6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYSZX and FLRT in my portfolio?

HYSZX and FLRT have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYSZX or FLRT?

HYSZX has higher volatility (0.89%) compared to FLRT (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSZX dropped -18.31% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.