PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSZX vs. PQCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSZX achieves a 1.66% return, which is significantly lower than PQCMX's 22.19% return.


HYSZX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.28%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.66%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
4.77%

PQCMX

1D
-0.47%
1M
-2.08%
6M
16.97%
YTD
22.19%
1Y
30.52%
3Y*
12.95%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYSZX
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund
1.66%7.84%6.49%9.57%-6.46%5.48%4.19%11.78%1.20%4.80%
PQCMX
PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund
22.19%13.62%5.09%-8.67%19.10%27.81%-1.13%8.78%-12.07%2.96%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSZX and PQCMX is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.15

The correlation between HYSZX and PQCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSZX vs. PQCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSZX
HYSZX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
HYSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

PQCMX
PQCMX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
PQCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PQCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
PQCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PQCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
PQCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) and PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSZXPQCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.33

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.21

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

7.68

+3.43

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PQCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSZX and PQCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSZX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, smaller than the maximum PQCMX drawdown of -33.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSZX and PQCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSZXPQCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-33.00%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.01%

-14.27%

+12.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.82%

-14.27%

+11.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.77%

-26.78%

+17.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-11.02%

+10.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-11.80%

+10.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

4.11%

-3.69%

Volatility

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund (HYSZX) is 0.70%, while PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund (PQCMX) has a volatility of 4.38%. This indicates that HYSZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSZXPQCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

4.38%

-3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.25%

15.14%

-12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84%

17.33%

-14.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.89%

17.03%

-13.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

15.19%

-10.97%

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSZX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PQCMX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSZX vs. PQCMX - Dividend Comparison

HYSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, less than PQCMX's 6.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYSZX
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Income Fund
6.39%6.45%6.27%4.84%5.01%4.56%5.00%5.60%5.94%5.73%6.33%6.76%
PQCMX
PGIM Quant Solutions Commodity Strategies Fund
6.62%8.09%4.14%3.93%31.36%47.61%0.00%1.02%3.02%1.42%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSZX and PQCMX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PQCMX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to HYSZX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSZX dropped -18.31% vs PQCMX's -33.00%.

PQCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSZX and PQCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer