PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSA vs. XB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSA vs. XB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than XB's 1.99% return.


HYSA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XB

1D
0.17%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.99%
6M
2.60%
1Y
7.31%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSA vs. XB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
1.26%8.37%6.71%5.98%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.99%7.81%7.41%5.28%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and XB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.65

The correlation between HYSA and XB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYSA vs. XB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYSA
XB

Communication Services

100.0%
5.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.0%

Energy

-

5.2%

Financial Services

-

2.3%

Healthcare

-

4.3%

Industrials

-

9.9%

Real Estate

-

3.1%

Technology

-

5.0%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Communication Services

HYSA
100.0%
XB
5.2%

Basic Materials

HYSA

-

XB
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HYSA

-

XB
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

HYSA

-

XB
3.0%

Energy

HYSA

-

XB
5.2%

Financial Services

HYSA

-

XB
2.3%

Healthcare

HYSA

-

XB
4.3%

Industrials

HYSA

-

XB
9.9%

Real Estate

HYSA

-

XB
3.1%

Technology

HYSA

-

XB
5.0%

Utilities

HYSA

-

XB
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSA vs. XB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XB
XB Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XB Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
XB Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. XB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSAXBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.40

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

14.93

-6.77

HYSA vs. XB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the XB Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and XB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSAXBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

1.97

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.85

+0.52

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. XB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, smaller than the maximum XB drawdown of -9.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and XB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSAXBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-9.25%

+4.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-2.16%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.29%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-1.32%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.49%

+0.29%

Volatility

HYSA vs. XB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) is 1.28%, while BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (XB) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that HYSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSAXBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.37%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

2.97%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

3.74%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

7.44%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

7.44%

-1.36%

HYSA vs. XB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYSA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYSA vs. XB - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, less than XB's 7.07% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.76%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%
XB
BondBloxx B Rated USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
7.07%6.96%7.74%7.87%5.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSA and XB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to HYSA (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSA dropped -4.90% vs XB's -9.25%.

On 1-year performance, XB leads with 7.31% vs 6.36% for HYSA. On fees, XB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XB has performed better with a 7.31% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for HYSA.

XB has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 6.76% for HYSA.

Their fees differ too: 0.55% for HYSA and 0.30% for XB.

XB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSA and XB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer