PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYSA vs. FSYD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYSA vs. FSYD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYSA achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSYD's 3.41% return.


HYSA

1D
0.19%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.49%
1Y
6.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSYD

1D
0.06%
1M
0.60%
YTD
3.41%
6M
4.01%
1Y
9.98%
3Y*
9.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYSA vs. FSYD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
1.26%8.37%6.71%5.98%
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
3.41%9.09%8.74%5.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HYSA and FSYD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2023

0.64

The correlation between HYSA and FSYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYSA vs. FSYD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYSA
FSYD

Communication Services

100.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

34.4%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

94.6%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

5.4%

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

HYSA
100.0%
FSYD
0.0%

Basic Materials

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Consumer Defensive

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Energy

HYSA

-

FSYD
34.4%

Financial Services

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Healthcare

HYSA

-

FSYD
94.6%

Industrials

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Real Estate

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Technology

HYSA

-

FSYD
5.4%

Utilities

HYSA

-

FSYD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYSA vs. FSYD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYSA
HYSA Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HYSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYSA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FSYD
FSYD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FSYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSYD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYSA vs. FSYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) and Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSAFSYDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.75

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.16

15.02

-6.86

HYSA vs. FSYD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the FSYD Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYSA and FSYD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSAFSYDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.44

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.37

0.77

+0.60

Drawdowns

HYSA vs. FSYD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYSA drawdown since its inception was -4.90%, smaller than the maximum FSYD drawdown of -12.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYSA and FSYD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSAFSYDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-12.11%

+7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-2.67%

-0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.20%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-2.40%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.67%

+0.11%

Volatility

HYSA vs. FSYD - Volatility Comparison

Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF (HYSA) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF (FSYD) at 1.11%. This indicates that HYSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSAFSYDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.11%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.55%

3.13%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68%

4.11%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.08%

7.85%

-1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.08%

7.85%

-1.77%

HYSA vs. FSYD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYSA and FSYD have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


Dividends

HYSA vs. FSYD - Dividend Comparison

HYSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.76%, more than FSYD's 6.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
FSYD
Fidelity Sustainable High Yield ETF
6.32%6.49%6.47%6.70%5.29%
HYSA
Bondbloxx USD High Yield Bond Sector Rotation ETF
6.76%6.70%6.99%2.65%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYSA and FSYD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYSA has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to FSYD (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYSA dropped -4.90% vs FSYD's -12.11%.

On 1-year performance, FSYD leads with 9.98% vs 6.36% for HYSA. Both ETFs have the same 0.55% expense ratio. On volatility, FSYD has been the lower-risk option at 1.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FSYD has performed better with a 9.98% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYSA and FSYD have the same expense ratio: 0.55% per year.

HYSA has the higher dividend yield at 6.76%, compared with 6.32% for FSYD.

They also come from different issuers: BondBloxx and Fidelity.

FSYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYSA and FSYD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer