PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYS vs. PYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYS vs. PYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than PYLD's 0.83% return.


HYS

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.28%
6M
1.03%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
5.05%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
5.19%
ALL TIME*
4.99%

PYLD

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.91%
6M
0.19%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
7.74%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$8.07M$9.33M$11.19M
$85.99M$101.13M$105.82M

HYS vs. PYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.42%8.80%8.42%6.88%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
0.83%9.57%7.69%5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and PYLD is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023

0.57

The correlation between HYS and PYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (3 years) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYS vs. PYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PYLD
PYLD Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYS vs. PYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYSPYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.32

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

1.65

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

7.13

+3.73

HYS vs. PYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the PYLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and PYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYS vs. PYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, which is greater than PYLD's maximum drawdown of -4.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and PYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSPYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-4.52%

-16.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-3.25%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

-3.88%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-1.13%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-0.64%

-0.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

0.75%

-0.27%

Volatility

HYS vs. PYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 0.76%, while PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PYLD) has a volatility of 0.88%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSPYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

0.88%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.80%

2.73%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

3.11%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.26%

3.96%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.78%

3.96%

+2.82%

HYS vs. PYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than PYLD's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYS vs. PYLD - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than PYLD's 6.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
6.87%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
PYLD
PIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
5.88%6.21%6.40%2.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYS and PYLD have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PYLD has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to HYS (0.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs PYLD's -4.52%.

On 3-year performance, HYS leads with 8.13% vs 7.74% for PYLD. On fees, PYLD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 0.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HYS has performed better with a 8.13% return vs 7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PYLD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 6.87%, compared with 5.88% for PYLD.

HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PYLD is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.55% for PYLD.

PYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYS and PYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer