PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYS vs. MINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYS vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, HYS has outperformed MINT with an annualized return of 5.35%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.70% annualized return.


HYS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.47%
YTD
1.33%
6M
1.83%
1Y
7.07%
3Y*
8.58%
5Y*
5.08%
10Y*
5.35%

MINT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.81%
6M
2.20%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.41%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
2.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYS vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.33%8.80%8.42%11.38%-5.42%4.77%3.27%10.22%-1.05%5.75%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
1.81%4.74%5.94%6.26%-1.01%-0.03%1.62%3.34%1.72%1.86%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and MINT is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.06

The correlation between HYS and MINT shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYS vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYS
HYS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

MINT
MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYS vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYSMINTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-15.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-62.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

20.53

-19.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.77

94.30

-90.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

939.26

-923.90

HYS vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYSMINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

17.09

-15.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

5.99

-5.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

2.87

-2.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

2.47

-1.65

Drawdowns

HYS vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and MINT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYSMINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.91%

-4.62%

-16.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-0.05%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

-0.16%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.61%

-2.42%

-8.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.91%

-4.62%

-16.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

0.00%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-0.17%

-1.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

0.00%

+0.46%

Volatility

HYS vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that HYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYSMINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

0.09%

+1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

0.20%

+2.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.47%

0.27%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.26%

0.58%

+5.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.84%

0.95%

+5.89%

HYS vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYS vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYS
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF
7.36%7.20%7.43%6.44%5.01%3.74%4.52%4.98%4.64%5.01%5.13%5.22%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
4.28%4.63%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYS and MINT have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYS has higher volatility (1.23%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs MINT's -4.62%.

On 10-year performance, HYS leads with 5.35% vs 2.70% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYS has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 2.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for HYS.

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.

HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.36% for MINT.

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.09 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYS and MINT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer