HYS vs. CMDT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HYS (PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - HYS is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYS returned 8.58%/yr vs 16.90%/yr for CMDT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYS charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.

Performance

HYS vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYS achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 23.96% return.

HYS

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 6M: 1.83%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 8.58%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 5.35%

CMDT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 23.96%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 35.85%
• 3Y*: 16.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYS vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF	1.33%	8.80%	8.42%	7.74%
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	23.96%	12.78%	6.93%	5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between HYS and CMDT is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2023	0.06

The correlation between HYS and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYS vs. CMDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYS	CMDT
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

HYS vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYS

HYS Risk / Return Rank: 68
HYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
HYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
HYS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
HYS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

CMDT

CMDT Risk / Return Rank: 88
CMDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CMDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
CMDT Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CMDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CMDT Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYS vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYS	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.92	-0.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	3.92	-0.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.50	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.77	8.03	-4.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	22.12	-6.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYS vs. CMDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the CMDT Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYS and CMDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYS	CMDT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.92	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.32	-0.51

Drawdowns

HYS vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYS drawdown since its inception was -20.91%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -9.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYS and CMDT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYS	CMDT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.91%	-9.69%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.88%	-4.49%	+2.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.98%	-9.69%	+4.71%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-2.86%	+2.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-2.69%	+1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.46%	1.63%	-1.17%

Volatility

HYS vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF (HYS) is 1.23%, while PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that HYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYS	CMDT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.23%	4.33%	-3.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.74%	10.30%	-7.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.47%	12.35%	-8.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.26%	12.21%	-5.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.84%	12.21%	-5.37%

HYS vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYS has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYS vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison

HYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.36%, more than CMDT's 2.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund	2.44%	3.04%	8.80%	2.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYS PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corporate Bond Index ETF	7.36%	7.20%	7.43%	6.44%	5.01%	3.74%	4.52%	4.98%	4.64%	5.01%	5.13%	5.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYS and CMDT in my portfolio?

HYS and CMDT have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYS or CMDT?

CMDT has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to HYS (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYS dropped -20.91% vs CMDT's -9.69%.

Which ETF is better, HYS or CMDT?

On 3-year performance, CMDT leads with 16.90% vs 8.58% for HYS. On fees, HYS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, HYS has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYS or CMDT?

Over the 3-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 16.90% return vs 8.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYS or CMDT?

HYS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CMDT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYS or CMDT?

HYS has the higher dividend yield at 7.36%, compared with 2.44% for CMDT.

What is the main difference between HYS and CMDT?

HYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CMDT is Commodities. HYS tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Constrained (0-5 Y), while CMDT tracks Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for HYS and 0.65% for CMDT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.