PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYRM vs. PIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYRM vs. PIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYRM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PIT

1D
-0.75%
1M
-10.60%
YTD
27.31%
6M
26.74%
1Y
38.33%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYRM vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
1.50%5.98%7.81%11.98%-1.35%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
27.31%21.63%6.77%-4.54%1.67%

Correlation

The correlation between HYRM and PIT is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022

0.08

The correlation between HYRM and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYRM vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYRM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PIT
PIT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
PIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYRM vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYRMPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

HYRM vs. PIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYRM vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYRMPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.59%

Volatility

HYRM vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYRMPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

HYRM vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYRM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYRM vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison

HYRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
5.92%6.28%6.08%5.78%4.69%
PIT
VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF
7.00%8.92%3.59%6.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYRM and PIT have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYRM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYRM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.

PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 5.92% for HYRM.

HYRM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HYRM and 0.55% for PIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYRM and PIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer