PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYRM vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYRM vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYRM

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.05%
1M
-4.34%
YTD
20.23%
6M
19.92%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
7.89%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYRM vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
1.50%5.98%7.81%11.98%-7.88%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
20.23%8.07%5.97%-5.63%2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between HYRM and FAAR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2022

-0.06

The correlation between HYRM and FAAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to -0.04 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYRM vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYRM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYRM vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYRMFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

HYRM vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYRM vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYRMFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

Volatility

HYRM vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYRMFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.53%

HYRM vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYRM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYRM vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

HYRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FAAR's 9.57% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.57%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
HYRM
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF
5.92%6.28%6.08%5.78%4.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYRM and FAAR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HYRM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HYRM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.57%, compared with 5.92% for HYRM.

HYRM is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HYRM and 0.95% for FAAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYRM and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer