HYRM vs. BSJR
HYRM (Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF) and BSJR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYRM tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies Risk Managed High Yield Index - USD - US Dollar - Benchmark TR Net while BSJR tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYRM returned 7.86%/yr vs 7.81%/yr for BSJR. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYRM charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJR.
Performance
HYRM vs. BSJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYRM achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than BSJR's 1.20% return.
HYRM
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSJR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 5.05%
- 3Y*
- 7.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- —
HYRM vs. BSJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYRM Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF | 1.50% | 5.98% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -7.10% |
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.20% | 7.41% | 7.15% | 11.91% | -7.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYRM and BSJR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.91 |
The correlation between HYRM and BSJR shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYRM vs. BSJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYRM
BSJR
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HYRM
BSJR
Basic Materials
HYRM
-
BSJR
Communication Services
HYRM
-
BSJR
Consumer Cyclical
HYRM
-
BSJR
Consumer Defensive
HYRM
-
BSJR
Energy
HYRM
-
BSJR
Healthcare
HYRM
-
BSJR
Industrials
HYRM
-
BSJR
Real Estate
HYRM
-
BSJR
Technology
HYRM
-
BSJR
Utilities
HYRM
-
BSJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYRM vs. BSJR — Risk / Return Rank
HYRM
BSJR
HYRM vs. BSJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYRM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 2.39 | -0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.00 | 3.71 | -0.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.48 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 4.37 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.29 | 20.22 | -5.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYRM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.39 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
HYRM vs. BSJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYRM drawdown since its inception was -12.42%, smaller than the maximum BSJR drawdown of -22.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYRM and BSJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYRM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.42% | -22.58% | +10.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.53% | -1.16% | -1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.62% | -3.15% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.05% | -0.18% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.57% | -3.25% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.59% | 0.25% | +0.34% |
Volatility
HYRM vs. BSJR - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF (HYRM) has a higher volatility of 1.05% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJR) at 0.60%. This indicates that HYRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYRM | BSJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 0.60% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.22% | 1.45% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 2.12% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.87% | 6.73% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.87% | 9.37% | -1.50% |
HYRM vs. BSJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYRM has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJR's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYRM vs. BSJR - Dividend Comparison
HYRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, more than BSJR's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJR Invesco BulletShares 2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.75% | 6.19% | 6.75% | 6.48% | 5.37% | 4.49% | 4.53% | 1.20% |
HYRM Xtrackers Risk Managed USD High Yield Strategy ETF | 5.92% | 6.28% | 6.08% | 5.78% | 4.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYRM and BSJR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYRM has higher volatility (1.05%) compared to BSJR (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYRM dropped -12.42% vs BSJR's -22.58%.
On 3-year performance, HYRM leads with 7.86% vs 7.81% for BSJR. On fees, HYRM is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, BSJR has been the lower-risk option at 0.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYRM has performed better with a 7.86% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYRM is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJR.
HYRM has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.75% for BSJR.
HYRM tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies Risk Managed High Yield Index - USD - US Dollar - Benchmark TR Net, while BSJR tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2027 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for HYRM and 0.42% for BSJR.
BSJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYRM and BSJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer