PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. OVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYMB having a 3.60% return and OVM slightly higher at 3.68%.


HYMB

1D
0.16%
1M
1.95%
YTD
3.60%
6M
3.52%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
4.93%
5Y*
0.47%
10Y*
2.36%

OVM

1D
0.16%
1M
1.08%
YTD
3.68%
6M
3.13%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
4.94%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%2.04%5.52%7.73%-15.54%5.16%3.74%0.64%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
3.68%4.14%3.42%7.35%-11.26%4.22%6.17%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and OVM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2019

0.56

The correlation between HYMB and OVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYMBOVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

4.29

-1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.49

16.16

-7.67

HYMB vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the OVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and OVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than OVM's maximum drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and OVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBOVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-15.58%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-2.44%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-8.20%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-15.58%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.50%

+0.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.98%

+0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

0.65%

+0.22%

Volatility

HYMB vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 0.85%, while Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBOVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.47%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.19%

3.47%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

4.27%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.67%

5.42%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

6.53%

+4.83%

HYMB vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, less than OVM's 6.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.51%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
6.13%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and OVM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVM has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to HYMB (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs OVM's -15.58%.

On 5-year performance, OVM leads with 1.49% vs 0.47% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OVM has performed better with a 1.49% return vs 0.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.13%, compared with 4.51% for HYMB.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.82% for OVM.

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and OVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer