PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYMB vs. HGER
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYMB vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYMB achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 24.74% return.


HYMB

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.57%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
2.35%

HGER

1D
0.55%
1M
-4.74%
YTD
24.74%
6M
24.88%
1Y
37.35%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
2.75%2.04%5.52%7.73%-12.35%
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
24.74%20.08%9.25%1.93%9.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and HGER is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022

0.03

The correlation between HYMB and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYMB vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYMB
HGER

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

103.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

HYMB
100.0%
HGER

-

Basic Materials

HYMB

-

HGER
103.6%

Communication Services

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Consumer Defensive

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Energy

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Financial Services

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Healthcare

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Industrials

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Real Estate

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Technology

HYMB

-

HGER

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYMB vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB
HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

HGER
HGER Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYMBHGERDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

4.64

-2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.67

14.85

-6.18

HYMB vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYMBHGERDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.20

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.86

-0.41

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and HGER.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYMBHGERDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-23.31%

-6.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-8.09%

+4.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.44%

-8.84%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-7.50%

+7.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-7.65%

+3.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

2.52%

-1.64%

Volatility

HYMB vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.34%, while Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYMBHGERDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

4.49%

-3.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.15%

14.77%

-11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.05%

17.09%

-13.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.66%

17.64%

-10.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.36%

17.64%

-6.28%

HYMB vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYMB vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than HGER's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HGER
Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF
5.68%7.09%3.28%7.24%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYMB
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF
4.55%4.55%4.29%4.07%3.77%3.19%3.55%3.95%4.03%3.78%4.08%4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYMB and HGER have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HGER has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to HYMB (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs HGER's -23.31%.

On 3-year performance, HGER leads with 19.99% vs 5.11% for HYMB. On fees, HYMB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HGER has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 5.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYMB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HGER.

HGER has the higher dividend yield at 5.68%, compared with 4.55% for HYMB.

HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HGER is Commodities. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while HGER tracks Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.68% for HGER.

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYMB and HGER

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer