HYMB vs. GLDM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HYMB (SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF) and GLDM (SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - HYMB is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while GLDM is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYMB returned 0.42%/yr vs 18.49%/yr for GLDM. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYMB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for GLDM.

Performance

HYMB vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HYMB having a 2.87% return and GLDM slightly higher at 3.00%.

HYMB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 1.19%
• YTD: 2.87%
• 6M: 3.18%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: 5.09%
• 5Y*: 0.42%
• 10Y*: 2.46%

GLDM

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -1.62%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 32.42%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYMB vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	2.87%	2.04%	5.52%	7.73%	-15.54%	5.16%	3.74%	9.51%	1.86%
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	3.00%	64.20%	27.08%	13.04%	-0.47%	-4.01%	25.10%	18.10%	1.84%

Correlation

The correlation between HYMB and GLDM is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2018	0.19

HYMB vs. GLDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYMB	GLDM
Utilities	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	100.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

HYMB vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYMB

HYMB Risk / Return Rank: 53
HYMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HYMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HYMB Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HYMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
HYMB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

GLDM

GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 32
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYMB vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYMB	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.24	+0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	1.63	+1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.25	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	1.70	+0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.51	4.23	+4.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYMB vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYMB and GLDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYMB	GLDM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	1.24	+0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	1.04	-0.98
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.22	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	1.02	-0.57

Drawdowns

HYMB vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYMB drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYMB and GLDM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYMB	GLDM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-21.63%	-7.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.11%	-19.14%	+16.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.44%	-19.14%	+11.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.15%	-20.92%	+0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-17.65%	+17.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-6.22%	+2.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.88%	7.69%	-6.81%

Volatility

HYMB vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HYMB) is 1.35%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that HYMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYMB	GLDM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.35%	5.47%	-4.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.14%	22.99%	-19.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.05%	26.39%	-22.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	17.91%	-11.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.36%	16.85%	-5.49%

HYMB vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYMB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYMB vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

HYMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYMB SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays High Yield Municipal Bond ETF	4.54%	4.55%	4.29%	4.07%	3.77%	3.19%	3.55%	3.95%	4.03%	3.78%	4.08%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYMB and GLDM in my portfolio?

HYMB and GLDM have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYMB or GLDM?

GLDM has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to HYMB (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYMB dropped -29.57% vs GLDM's -21.63%.

Which ETF is better, HYMB or GLDM?

On 5-year performance, GLDM leads with 18.49% vs 0.42% for HYMB. On fees, GLDM is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, HYMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYMB or GLDM?

Over the 5-year period, GLDM has performed better with a 18.49% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYMB or GLDM?

GLDM is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HYMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYMB or GLDM?

HYMB has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 0.00% for GLDM.

What is the main difference between HYMB and GLDM?

HYMB is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while GLDM is Gold. HYMB tracks Bloomberg Municipal Yield, while GLDM tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYMB and 0.10% for GLDM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HYMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.