PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLS vs. BSJO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLS vs. BSJO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYLS

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.39%
YTD
0.28%
6M
0.70%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
7.73%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
4.35%

BSJO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLS vs. BSJO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLS vs. BSJO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLS
HYLS Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
HYLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYLS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
HYLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLS vs. BSJO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF (HYLS) and Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYLSBSJODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.42

HYLS vs. BSJO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLSBSJODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

Drawdowns

HYLS vs. BSJO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLS drawdown since its inception was -22.99%, which is greater than BSJO's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLS and BSJO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLSBSJODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.99%

0.00%

-22.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

0.00%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.15%

0.00%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

Volatility

HYLS vs. BSJO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLSBSJODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

0.00%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.62%

0.00%

+6.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.70%

0.00%

+6.70%

HYLS vs. BSJO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLS has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than BSJO's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLS vs. BSJO - Dividend Comparison

HYLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, while BSJO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJO
Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYLS
First Trust Tactical High Yield ETF
6.70%6.38%6.25%5.98%7.38%5.48%5.09%5.17%5.81%5.53%5.37%6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BSJO is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BSJO is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for HYLS.

HYLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.70%, compared with 0.00% for BSJO.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for HYLS and 0.42% for BSJO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLS and BSJO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer