PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYLD vs. SCYB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYLD vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in High Yield ETF (HYLD) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HYLD

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCYB

1D
0.21%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.99%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLD vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.86%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
1.76%8.33%8.15%6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLD and SCYB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYLD vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLD

SCYB
SCYB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SCYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCYB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SCYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCYB Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLD vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Yield ETF (HYLD) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HYLD vs. SCYB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYLDSCYBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

Drawdowns

HYLD vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYLDSCYBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

Volatility

HYLD vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYLDSCYBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.13%

HYLD vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYLD has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYLD vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison

HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYLD
High Yield ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.67%7.86%6.45%7.52%7.46%7.97%7.18%6.59%10.87%
SCYB
Schwab High Yield Bond ETF
6.92%6.99%7.06%3.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYLD and SCYB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.

SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.

They also come from different issuers: Eve Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for HYLD and 0.03% for SCYB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYLD and SCYB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer