HYLD vs. SCYB
HYLD (High Yield ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYLD is actively managed, while SCYB is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYLD charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
HYLD vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYLD
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- 6M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYLD vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.22% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 2.11% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 7.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYLD and SCYB is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2023 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYLD vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
HYLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCYB
HYLD vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Yield ETF (HYLD) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYLD | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.45 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.94 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYLD vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYLD | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -4.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.23% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -0.50% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.54% | — |
Volatility
HYLD vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYLD | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.74% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 5.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 5.08% | — |
HYLD vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYLD has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYLD vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
HYLD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCYB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYLD High Yield ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.67% | 7.86% | 6.45% | 7.52% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 7.18% | 6.59% | 10.87% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYLD and SCYB have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for HYLD.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 0.00% for HYLD.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for HYLD and 0.03% for SCYB.
Find the right allocation for HYLD and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer