HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

HYLD-U.TO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)) and GLCC.TO (Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYLD-U.TO returned 21.67%/yr vs 40.27%/yr for GLCC.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HYLD-U.TO is traded in USD, while GLCC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the GLCC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYLD-U.TO achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than GLCC.TO's 0.36% return.

HYLD-U.TO

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 8.37%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 37.97%
• 3Y*: 21.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLCC.TO

• 1D: 2.03%
• 1M: 1.51%
• YTD: 0.36%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 60.98%
• 3Y*: 40.27%
• 5Y*: 18.43%
• 10Y*: 13.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HYLD-U.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)	15.25%	19.83%	23.68%	17.40%	-20.88%
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	0.36%	148.81%	10.69%	8.61%	-6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.37

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYLD-U.TO	GLCC.TO
Technology	33.9%	-
Financial Services	12.4%	-
Communication Services	11.3%	-
Healthcare	9.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	-
Industrials	5.0%	-
Basic Materials	5.0%	100.0%
Energy	4.9%	-
Real Estate	3.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	-
Utilities	2.4%	-

Return for Risk

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYLD-U.TO

HYLD-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 74
HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
HYLD-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
HYLD-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
HYLD-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HYLD-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GLCC.TO

GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 42
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYLD-U.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	1.42	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	1.83	+1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.26	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	2.09	+0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.05	5.57	+7.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYLD-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYLD-U.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.55	1.42	+1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.54	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.00	+0.59

Drawdowns

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYLD-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.64%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -78.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYLD-U.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.64%	-78.75%	+47.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.46%	-29.27%	+16.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.66%	-29.27%	+6.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.06%	-23.26%	+23.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.72%	-45.80%	+36.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.92%	10.99%	-8.07%

Volatility

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD) (HYLD-U.TO) is 4.18%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 15.43%. This indicates that HYLD-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYLD-U.TO	GLCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.18%	15.43%	-11.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	35.35%	-23.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.98%	43.01%	-28.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	34.47%	-14.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	34.11%	-14.38%

Dividends

HYLD-U.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HYLD-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than GLCC.TO's 8.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLCC.TO Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF	8.51%	6.01%	10.30%	11.16%	10.08%	6.31%	6.47%	4.58%	5.62%	7.09%	9.21%	11.63%
HYLD-U.TO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Covered Call ETF (USD)	7.56%	8.06%	8.49%	8.82%	9.99%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO in my portfolio?

HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between HYLD-U.TO and GLCC.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Hamilton and Global X.