PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYHG vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYHG achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, HYHG has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 6.12%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


HYHG

1D
0.12%
1M
0.64%
YTD
3.03%
6M
3.57%
1Y
7.52%
3Y*
9.78%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
6.12%

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
3.03%5.31%11.41%14.69%-1.71%5.75%0.16%12.02%-1.95%3.76%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between HYHG and TQQQ is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2013

0.47

The correlation between HYHG and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYHG
TQQQ

Communication Services

1.1%
15.8%

Healthcare

0.6%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

7.7%

Energy

-

0.6%

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

2.8%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

53.8%

Utilities

-

1.4%

Communication Services

HYHG
1.1%
TQQQ
15.8%

Healthcare

HYHG
0.6%
TQQQ
4.2%

Basic Materials

HYHG

-

TQQQ
1.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HYHG

-

TQQQ
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

HYHG

-

TQQQ
7.7%

Energy

HYHG

-

TQQQ
0.6%

Financial Services

HYHG

-

TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

HYHG

-

TQQQ
2.8%

Real Estate

HYHG

-

TQQQ
0.1%

Technology

HYHG

-

TQQQ
53.8%

Utilities

HYHG

-

TQQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYHG vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYHG
HYHG Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
HYHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HYHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYHG Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYHGTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

3.60

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.28

11.77

+0.51

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYHG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYHG and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYHGTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.80

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.42

+0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

0.68

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.74

-0.27

Drawdowns

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYHG drawdown since its inception was -25.71%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYHG and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYHGTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.71%

-81.66%

+55.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

-36.97%

+34.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-58.04%

+50.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.21%

-81.66%

+72.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.71%

-81.66%

+55.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-2.29%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-18.52%

+15.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

11.28%

-10.67%

Volatility

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG) is 1.42%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that HYHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYHGTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

13.35%

-11.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.30%

36.04%

-31.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.56%

47.60%

-42.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

66.50%

-58.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.15%

65.95%

-56.80%

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYHG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYHG vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

HYHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYHG
ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged
6.78%6.97%6.57%6.07%5.58%4.54%5.21%6.06%6.45%5.57%5.37%6.37%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYHG and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to HYHG (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYHG dropped -25.71% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 10-year performance, TQQQ leads with 44.95% vs 6.12% for HYHG. On fees, HYHG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HYHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 44.95% return vs 6.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYHG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.78%, compared with 0.37% for TQQQ.

HYHG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. HYHG tracks Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYHG and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYHG and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer