HYGV vs. ESHY
HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYGV tracks the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. HYGV charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.
Performance
HYGV vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYGV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
ESHY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYGV vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 0.72% |
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% |
HYGV vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGV
ESHY
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
HYGV
ESHY
Basic Materials
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Communication Services
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Consumer Defensive
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Financial Services
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Healthcare
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Industrials
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Real Estate
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Technology
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Utilities
HYGV
-
ESHY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGV vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYGV
ESHY
HYGV vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGV | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGV | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | — | — |
Drawdowns
HYGV vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and ESHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGV | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | 0.00% | -23.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | 0.00% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | — | — |
Volatility
HYGV vs. ESHY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGV | ESHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 0.00% | +3.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 0.00% | +7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 0.00% | +9.20% |
HYGV vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGV vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison
HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.40% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.
HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.20% for ESHY.
Find the right allocation for HYGV and ESHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer