HYGV vs. BSJQ
HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) and BSJQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYGV tracks the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index while BSJQ tracks the NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYGV returned 3.52%/yr vs 3.75%/yr for BSJQ. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYGV charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJQ.
Performance
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGV achieves a 1.56% return, which is significantly higher than BSJQ's 0.89% return.
HYGV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 6.88%
- 3Y*
- 8.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BSJQ
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 7.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- —
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 1.56% | 7.92% | 8.02% | 12.11% | -12.60% | 5.93% | 8.01% | 15.76% | -5.21% |
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 0.89% | 6.59% | 7.49% | 9.83% | -7.35% | 4.53% | 2.80% | 16.74% | -4.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGV and BSJQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2018 | 0.87 |
The correlation between HYGV and BSJQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYGV
BSJQ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
HYGV
BSJQ
Basic Materials
HYGV
-
BSJQ
-
Communication Services
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Consumer Cyclical
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Consumer Defensive
HYGV
-
BSJQ
-
Financial Services
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Healthcare
HYGV
-
BSJQ
-
Industrials
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Real Estate
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Technology
HYGV
-
BSJQ
Utilities
HYGV
-
BSJQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGV vs. BSJQ — Risk / Return Rank
HYGV
BSJQ
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGV | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.76 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 8.55 | -5.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.11 | 40.68 | -29.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGV | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 3.34 | -1.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.66 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGV drawdown since its inception was -23.47%, roughly equal to the maximum BSJQ drawdown of -24.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGV and BSJQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGV | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.47% | -24.13% | +0.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.68% | -0.54% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.56% | -2.66% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.12% | -11.95% | -5.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.39% | +0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.32% | -2.17% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.62% | 0.11% | +0.51% |
Volatility
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) has a higher volatility of 1.18% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF (BSJQ) at 0.54%. This indicates that HYGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGV | BSJQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.18% | 0.54% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 0.98% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 1.38% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.59% | 5.73% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.20% | 8.44% | +0.76% |
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGV has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJQ's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGV vs. BSJQ - Dividend Comparison
HYGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than BSJQ's 5.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 High Yield Corp Bond ETF | 5.83% | 6.10% | 6.58% | 6.58% | 5.58% | 4.27% | 4.64% | 4.59% | 2.39% |
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund | 7.40% | 7.48% | 8.20% | 8.77% | 7.64% | 6.07% | 6.18% | 7.95% | 5.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGV and BSJQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYGV has higher volatility (1.18%) compared to BSJQ (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGV dropped -23.47% vs BSJQ's -24.13%.
On 5-year performance, BSJQ leads with 3.75% vs 3.52% for HYGV. On fees, HYGV is cheaper at 0.37% per year. On volatility, BSJQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BSJQ has performed better with a 3.75% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYGV is cheaper with a 0.37% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJQ.
HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.40%, compared with 5.83% for BSJQ.
HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index, while BSJQ tracks NASDAQ BulletShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond 2026 TR Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.37% for HYGV and 0.42% for BSJQ.
BSJQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGV and BSJQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer