HYGH vs. STPZ
HYGH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF) and STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGH is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by iShares, while STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y). HYGH is actively managed, while STPZ is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYGH returned 6.31%/yr vs 2.88%/yr for STPZ. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. HYGH charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for STPZ.
Performance
HYGH vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYGH achieves a 2.94% return, which is significantly higher than STPZ's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, HYGH has outperformed STPZ with an annualized return of 6.31%, while STPZ has yielded a comparatively lower 2.88% annualized return.
HYGH
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.94%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 7.78%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.31%
STPZ
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
HYGH vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 2.94% | 6.94% | 11.22% | 12.17% | -0.92% | 5.82% | 0.54% | 11.09% | -0.85% | 6.38% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.77% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 4.28% | -4.49% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.83% | 0.04% | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYGH and STPZ is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2014 | -0.03 |
The correlation between HYGH and STPZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.04 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYGH vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank
HYGH
STPZ
HYGH vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYGH | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.47 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.82 | 4.75 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.86 | 16.03 | +2.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYGH | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 2.43 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.89 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.97 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.90 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
HYGH vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYGH drawdown since its inception was -23.88%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGH and STPZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYGH | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.88% | -6.77% | -17.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.62% | -0.93% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.06% | -1.35% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -8.24% | -6.70% | -1.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.88% | -6.77% | -17.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | -0.13% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.23% | -1.31% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | 0.28% | +0.13% |
Volatility
HYGH vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison
iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF (HYGH) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) at 0.44%. This indicates that HYGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STPZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYGH | STPZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.44% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.84% | 1.20% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65% | 1.82% | +1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.07% | 3.29% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.35% | 2.98% | +5.37% |
HYGH vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYGH has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYGH vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison
HYGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, more than STPZ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGH iShares Interest Rate Hedged High Yield Bond ETF | 6.62% | 6.86% | 7.85% | 8.95% | 6.21% | 3.74% | 4.06% | 4.89% | 6.45% | 4.79% | 4.60% | 5.75% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.11% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYGH and STPZ have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYGH has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to STPZ (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYGH dropped -23.88% vs STPZ's -6.77%.
On 10-year performance, HYGH leads with 6.31% vs 2.88% for STPZ. On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, STPZ has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HYGH has performed better with a 6.31% return vs 2.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for HYGH.
HYGH has the higher dividend yield at 6.62%, compared with 4.11% for STPZ.
HYGH is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for HYGH and 0.20% for STPZ.
STPZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYGH and STPZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer