HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

HYGB.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF) and MOAT.L (VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYGB.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while MOAT.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYGB.L returned 3.23%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for MOAT.L. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYGB.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for MOAT.L.

Performance

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HYGB.L is traded in GBP, while MOAT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MOAT.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYGB.L achieves a 3.41% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT.L's -0.22% return.

HYGB.L

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -0.50%
• 6M: 2.88%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 1Y: 7.65%
• 3Y*: 8.57%
• 5Y*: 3.23%
• 10Y*: —

MOAT.L

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.69%
• 6M: -2.36%
• YTD: -0.22%
• 1Y: 7.19%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: 4.05%
• 10Y*: 10.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
HYGB.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF	3.41%	1.56%	13.72%	1.66%	-2.52%	0.59%	1.90%	10.99%	-23.28%
MOAT.L VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF	-0.22%	-0.31%	13.06%	12.45%	-9.03%	26.72%	10.28%	28.69%	6.12%

Correlation

The correlation between HYGB.L and MOAT.L is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018	0.18

The correlation between HYGB.L and MOAT.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYGB.L

HYGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
HYGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
HYGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
HYGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
HYGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 44

MOAT.L

MOAT.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MOAT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
MOAT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 18
MOAT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
MOAT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) and VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYGB.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	0.52	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	0.84	+0.87
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.10	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.30	0.66	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.91	1.47	+4.44

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the MOAT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYGB.L and MOAT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYGB.L drawdown since its inception was -26.72%, which is greater than MOAT.L's maximum drawdown of -25.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYGB.L and MOAT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYGB.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.72%	-25.07%	-1.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.31%	-10.93%	+7.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.96%	-23.01%	+14.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.02%	-23.01%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-25.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.23%	-4.71%	+2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-4.47%	-9.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.29%	4.88%	-3.59%

Volatility

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF (HYGB.L) is 1.95%, while VanEck Morningstar US Sustainable Wide Moat UCITS ETF (MOAT.L) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that HYGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYGB.L	MOAT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.95%	5.29%	-3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.98%	10.96%	-5.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.52%	13.84%	-7.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	15.79%	+2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	16.83%	+0.58%

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYGB.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT.L's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYGB.L vs. MOAT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither HYGB.L nor MOAT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYGB.L and MOAT.L in my portfolio?

HYGB.L and MOAT.L have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HYGB.L or MOAT.L?

On fees, HYGB.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYGB.L or MOAT.L?

HYGB.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for MOAT.L.

What is the main difference between HYGB.L and MOAT.L?

HYGB.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MOAT.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. HYGB.L tracks VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF, while MOAT.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYGB.L and 0.49% for MOAT.L.