HYG vs. SPY
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 5.04%/yr vs 15.42%/yr for SPY. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
HYG vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 5.04%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.42% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 6.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 3.75%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
SPY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.42%
- 1Y
- 24.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.86%
- 5Y*
- 13.36%
- 10Y*
- 15.42%
HYG vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.07% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and SPY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007 | 0.66 |
The correlation between HYG and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYG vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
SPY
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
HYG
SPY
Real Estate
HYG
SPY
Basic Materials
HYG
-
SPY
Communication Services
HYG
-
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
SPY
Energy
HYG
-
SPY
Financial Services
HYG
-
SPY
Healthcare
HYG
-
SPY
Industrials
HYG
-
SPY
Technology
HYG
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
SPY
HYG vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 2.74 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | 12.39 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYG vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -55.19% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -8.88% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -18.76% | +14.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -24.50% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -33.72% | +11.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.35% | +2.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -9.04% | +5.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 1.97% | -1.44% |
Volatility
HYG vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 4.34% | -3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 9.58% | -6.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 12.29% | -8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 17.12% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 17.96% | -9.67% |
HYG vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.90%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.90% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and SPY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.42% vs 5.04% for HYG. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.42% return vs 5.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.90%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPY is S&P 500. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer