PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. SEIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. SEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly lower than SEIX's 3.10% return.


HYG

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.02%
6M
1.13%
YTD
1.81%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
8.25%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.64%
ALL TIME*
4.95%

SEIX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.83%
6M
3.15%
YTD
3.10%
1Y
5.59%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.88B$2.52B$2.69B
$1.85M$1.52M$1.74M

HYG vs. SEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.81%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%5.28%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
3.10%5.10%8.42%12.51%-1.77%5.49%3.17%3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and SEIX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2019

0.17

The correlation between HYG and SEIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. SEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SEIX
SEIX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
SEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HYG vs. SEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGSEIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.76

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

4.97

-2.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.47

19.73

-10.26

HYG vs. SEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the SEIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and SEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. SEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than SEIX's maximum drawdown of -17.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and SEIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGSEIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-17.51%

-16.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-1.13%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-3.01%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-6.69%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.04%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-0.85%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.54%

0.28%

+0.26%

Volatility

HYG vs. SEIX - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 0.83% compared to Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF (SEIX) at 0.44%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGSEIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

0.44%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.17%

1.32%

+1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

1.63%

+2.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

2.92%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

4.29%

+3.92%

HYG vs. SEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than SEIX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. SEIX - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, less than SEIX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.91%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
SEIX
Virtus Seix Senior Loan ETF
7.15%7.52%8.09%8.74%5.76%4.16%3.75%3.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and SEIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYG has higher volatility (0.83%) compared to SEIX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs SEIX's -17.51%.

On 5-year performance, SEIX leads with 5.79% vs 3.73% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SEIX has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SEIX has performed better with a 5.79% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for SEIX.

SEIX has the higher dividend yield at 7.15%, compared with 5.91% for HYG.

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SEIX is Bank Loan. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.57% for SEIX.

SEIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.45 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and SEIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer