HYG vs. OILK
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYG returned 3.77%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
HYG vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
HYG
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.73%
- 1Y
- 6.51%
- 3Y*
- 8.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.94%
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
HYG vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.32% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 30.48% | -20.40% | 2.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and OILK is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2016 | 0.19 |
The correlation between HYG and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYG vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYG
OILK
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
HYG
OILK
-
Real Estate
HYG
OILK
-
Basic Materials
HYG
-
OILK
-
Communication Services
HYG
-
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
HYG
-
OILK
Consumer Defensive
HYG
-
OILK
-
Energy
HYG
-
OILK
-
Financial Services
HYG
-
OILK
-
Healthcare
HYG
-
OILK
-
Industrials
HYG
-
OILK
-
Technology
HYG
-
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
OILK
HYG vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 2.06 | -0.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.59 | 2.59 | 0.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.42 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.34 | 6.91 | +5.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.06 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.59 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.12 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
HYG vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -83.76% | +49.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -17.35% | +15.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -23.42% | +18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -34.69% | +18.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -3.66% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -32.61% | +29.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 8.56% | -8.03% |
Volatility
HYG vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.21%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 10.44% | -9.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | 23.26% | -20.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81% | 28.75% | -24.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 30.12% | -22.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 35.97% | -27.68% |
HYG vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.92% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and OILK have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 3.77% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 5.92% for HYG.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while OILK is Oil & Gas. HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer