PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. HYEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. HYEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than HYEM's 3.92% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has outperformed HYEM with an annualized return of 4.94%, while HYEM has yielded a comparatively lower 4.65% annualized return.


HYG

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.94%

HYEM

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.26%
YTD
3.92%
6M
4.87%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*
4.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. HYEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.32%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
3.92%9.24%12.14%8.35%-13.39%-1.31%6.87%12.85%-3.38%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and HYEM is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2012

0.46

The correlation between HYG and HYEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYG vs. HYEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYG
HYEM

Utilities

99.6%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

100.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

HYG
99.6%
HYEM

-

Real Estate

HYG
0.4%
HYEM

-

Basic Materials

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Communication Services

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Cyclical

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Consumer Defensive

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Energy

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Financial Services

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Healthcare

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Industrials

HYG

-

HYEM
100.0%

Technology

HYG

-

HYEM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. HYEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HYEM
HYEM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HYEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYEM Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HYEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. HYEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGHYEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

2.39

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

3.50

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.79

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

15.48

-3.14

HYG vs. HYEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the HYEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and HYEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGHYEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.39

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.50

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.54

-0.08

Drawdowns

HYG vs. HYEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than HYEM's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and HYEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGHYEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-30.96%

-3.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-2.73%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-5.23%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-26.30%

+10.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

-30.96%

+8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.10%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-4.40%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.67%

-0.14%

Volatility

HYG vs. HYEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.21%, while VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF (HYEM) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGHYEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.33%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

3.24%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

4.33%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

7.49%

+0.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

9.27%

-0.98%

HYG vs. HYEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HYEM's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. HYEM - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than HYEM's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYEM
VanEck Vectors Emerging Markets High Yield Bond ETF
6.52%6.67%6.34%6.27%6.47%5.33%5.56%6.14%5.71%5.86%6.25%7.64%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.92%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and HYEM have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYEM has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to HYG (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs HYEM's -30.96%.

On 10-year performance, HYG leads with 4.94% vs 4.65% for HYEM. On fees, HYEM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HYG has performed better with a 4.94% return vs 4.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYEM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYEM has the higher dividend yield at 6.52%, compared with 5.92% for HYG.

HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while HYEM tracks BofA Merrill Lynch Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.40% for HYEM.

HYEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and HYEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer