PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. HYDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. HYDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with HYG at 1.32% and HYDB at 1.32%.


HYG

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.73%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
8.48%
5Y*
3.77%
10Y*
4.94%

HYDB

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.32%
6M
1.87%
1Y
7.20%
3Y*
9.11%
5Y*
4.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. HYDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.32%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%1.35%
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
1.32%8.10%9.11%14.02%-9.99%5.14%7.39%16.13%-3.18%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and HYDB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2017

0.87

The correlation between HYG and HYDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. HYDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. HYDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYGHYDBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.91

-0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.59

2.88

-0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

2.55

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

11.30

+1.04

HYG vs. HYDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the HYDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and HYDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYGHYDBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.91

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.67

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.71

-0.25

Drawdowns

HYG vs. HYDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than HYDB's maximum drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and HYDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGHYDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-21.58%

-12.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-2.83%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-5.58%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-14.28%

-1.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.21%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-2.39%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

0.64%

-0.11%

Volatility

HYG vs. HYDB - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) at 1.13%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGHYDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.21%

1.13%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.01%

2.93%

+0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

3.79%

+0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

7.04%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

7.76%

+0.53%

HYG vs. HYDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HYDB's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. HYDB - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than HYDB's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYDB
iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF
7.00%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%0.00%0.00%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.92%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, HYG and HYDB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to HYDB (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs HYDB's -21.58%.

On 5-year performance, HYDB leads with 4.67% vs 3.77% for HYG. On fees, HYDB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HYDB has performed better with a 4.67% return vs 3.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYDB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYDB has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 5.92% for HYG.

HYG tracks iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.35% for HYDB.

HYDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and HYDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer