HYG vs. FLRT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYG is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 4.94%/yr vs 5.00%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.

Performance

HYG vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than FLRT's 1.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HYG having a 4.94% annualized return and FLRT not far ahead at 5.00%.

HYG

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.73%
• 1Y: 6.51%
• 3Y*: 8.48%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: 4.94%

FLRT

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.55%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 8.90%
• 5Y*: 5.98%
• 10Y*: 5.00%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	1.32%	8.59%	7.97%	11.54%	-10.98%	3.76%	4.47%	14.09%	-2.02%	6.07%
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	1.83%	6.24%	9.18%	14.59%	-2.72%	3.18%	2.78%	9.44%	-1.14%	1.72%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and FLRT is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2015	0.19

The correlation between HYG and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HYG vs. FLRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HYG	FLRT
Utilities	99.6%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	99.2%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

HYG vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG

HYG Risk / Return Rank: 55
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 66

FLRT

FLRT Risk / Return Rank: 85
FLRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FLRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Omega Ratio Rank: 97
FLRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FLRT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HYG	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	3.89	-2.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	6.03	-3.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.95	-0.62
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.79	3.43	-0.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.34	12.62	-0.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HYG vs. FLRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the FLRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and FLRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HYG	FLRT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	3.89	-2.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	2.61	-2.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60	0.81	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.46	0.75	-0.29

Drawdowns

HYG vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than FLRT's maximum drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and FLRT.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYG	FLRT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.25%	-20.96%	-13.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.34%	-1.78%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.56%	-2.87%	-1.69%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.79%	-7.60%	-8.19%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.03%	-20.96%	-1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.28%	-0.15%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.24%	-1.41%	-1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.53%	0.48%	+0.05%

Volatility

HYG vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.40%. This indicates that HYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYG	FLRT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	0.40%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.01%	1.19%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81%	1.57%	+2.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.53%	2.30%	+5.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.29%	6.17%	+2.12%

HYG vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

HYG vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than FLRT's 6.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF	6.81%	6.93%	7.93%	8.40%	5.81%	3.16%	3.52%	4.30%	3.95%	3.20%	3.38%	3.21%
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	5.92%	5.71%	6.01%	5.74%	5.30%	4.02%	4.88%	4.99%	5.54%	5.12%	5.27%	5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYG and FLRT in my portfolio?

HYG and FLRT have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYG or FLRT?

HYG has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to FLRT (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs FLRT's -20.96%.

Which ETF is better, HYG or FLRT?

On 10-year performance, FLRT leads with 5.00% vs 4.94% for HYG. On fees, HYG is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYG or FLRT?

Over the 10-year period, FLRT has performed better with a 5.00% return vs 4.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYG or FLRT?

HYG is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for FLRT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYG or FLRT?

FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 5.92% for HYG.

What is the main difference between HYG and FLRT?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.69% for FLRT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.89 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.