PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. EMVL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than EMVL.L's 45.06% return.


HYG

1D
0.13%
1M
1.25%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.29%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.03%

EMVL.L

1D
2.91%
1M
8.74%
YTD
45.06%
6M
49.13%
1Y
82.04%
3Y*
36.29%
5Y*
16.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.78%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.15%
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
45.06%43.13%14.49%18.37%-16.29%5.29%7.72%17.64%-2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and EMVL.L is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. EMVL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EMVL.L
EMVL.L Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMVL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYGEMVL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.64

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

7.00

-4.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

22.34

-9.23

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the EMVL.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and EMVL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, roughly equal to the maximum EMVL.L drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and EMVL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYGEMVL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-34.95%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-11.65%

+9.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-16.42%

+11.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-33.55%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.38%

+3.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-9.53%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

3.66%

-3.13%

Volatility

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc) (EMVL.L) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMVL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYGEMVL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

10.29%

-8.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

18.92%

-15.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

21.93%

-18.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

20.24%

-12.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

21.19%

-12.90%

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMVL.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYG vs. EMVL.L - Dividend Comparison

HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, while EMVL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMVL.L
iShares Edge MSCI EM Value Factor UCITS ETF USD(Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.89%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and EMVL.L have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMVL.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMVL.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EMVL.L is Emerging Markets Equities. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while EMVL.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.40% for EMVL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and EMVL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer