HYG vs. EEMV
HYG (iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYG returned 5.03%/yr vs 7.04%/yr for EEMV. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYG charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.
Performance
HYG vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 20.09% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 5.03%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively higher 7.04% annualized return.
HYG
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 6.95%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 5.03%
EEMV
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- YTD
- 20.09%
- 6M
- 21.21%
- 1Y
- 27.78%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.04%
HYG vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.78% | 8.59% | 7.97% | 11.54% | -10.98% | 3.76% | 4.47% | 14.09% | -2.02% | 6.07% |
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 20.09% | 13.45% | 7.98% | 7.75% | -13.94% | 5.05% | 6.90% | 7.83% | -5.81% | 27.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYG and EEMV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.59 |
The correlation between HYG and EEMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (3 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYG vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank
HYG
EEMV
HYG vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYG | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 3.03 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.11 | 10.90 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYG vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and EEMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYG | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.25% | -31.56% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -9.22% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.56% | -12.47% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.79% | -21.90% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.03% | -31.56% | +9.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -7.96% | +4.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | 2.56% | -2.03% |
Volatility
HYG vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 8.16%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYG | EEMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.31% | 8.16% | -6.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 13.51% | -10.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 14.67% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.53% | 12.22% | -4.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.29% | 13.99% | -5.70% |
HYG vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYG vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison
HYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, more than EEMV's 3.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.07% | 2.65% | 3.50% | 2.75% | 1.93% | 2.14% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.46% | 2.34% | 2.79% | 2.55% |
HYG iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 5.89% | 5.71% | 6.01% | 5.74% | 5.30% | 4.02% | 4.88% | 4.99% | 5.54% | 5.12% | 5.27% | 5.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYG and EEMV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EEMV has higher volatility (8.16%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs EEMV's -31.56%.
On 10-year performance, EEMV leads with 7.04% vs 5.03% for HYG. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EEMV has performed better with a 7.04% return vs 5.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.
HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 3.07% for EEMV.
HYG is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for HYG and 0.25% for EEMV.
EEMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYG and EEMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer