PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYG vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYG achieves a 1.78% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HYG has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 5.03%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.


HYG

1D
0.13%
1M
1.25%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.29%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.03%

^GSPC

1D
1.65%
1M
1.97%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.82%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
13.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.78%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HYG and ^GSPC is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2007

0.65

The correlation between HYG and ^GSPC shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYG vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYG^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.91

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

13.08

+0.02

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYG Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYG and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYG drawdown since its inception was -34.25%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYG and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYG^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.25%

-56.78%

+22.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-9.10%

+6.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-18.90%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.79%

-25.43%

+9.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

-33.92%

+11.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.73%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-10.72%

+7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.53%

2.02%

-1.49%

Volatility

HYG vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) is 1.31%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that HYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYG^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.31%

4.67%

-3.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.08%

9.83%

-6.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

12.44%

-8.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.53%

16.99%

-9.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

18.11%

-9.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYG and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

^GSPC has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYG dropped -34.25% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYG and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer