HYFI vs. BUFC
HYFI (AB High Yield ETF) and BUFC (AB Conservative Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while BUFC is a Options Trading fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYFI returned 7.81% vs 8.86% for BUFC. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BUFC.
Performance
HYFI vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYFI achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BUFC's 2.84% return.
HYFI
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 7.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 2.84%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- 1Y
- 8.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYFI vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 1.95% | 8.91% | 7.98% | 1.03% |
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF | 2.84% | 5.50% | 10.81% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYFI and BUFC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.51 |
The correlation between HYFI and BUFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYFI vs. BUFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYFI
BUFC
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
HYFI
BUFC
Consumer Cyclical
HYFI
BUFC
Energy
HYFI
BUFC
Basic Materials
HYFI
-
BUFC
Consumer Defensive
HYFI
-
BUFC
Financial Services
HYFI
-
BUFC
Healthcare
HYFI
-
BUFC
Industrials
HYFI
-
BUFC
Real Estate
HYFI
-
BUFC
Technology
HYFI
-
BUFC
Utilities
HYFI
-
BUFC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYFI vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank
HYFI
BUFC
HYFI vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYFI | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.40 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 2.46 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.18 | 10.49 | +3.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYFI | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.09 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 1.42 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
HYFI vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYFI drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFI and BUFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYFI | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.34% | -8.29% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.49% | -3.62% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.12% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.76% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.85% | -0.30% |
Volatility
HYFI vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison
AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) at 0.98%. This indicates that HYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYFI | BUFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 0.98% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.10% | 3.36% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.95% | 4.25% | -0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 5.64% | -0.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 5.64% | -0.28% |
HYFI vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYFI vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison
HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, while BUFC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFC AB Conservative Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYFI AB High Yield ETF | 6.64% | 6.66% | 6.57% | 4.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYFI and BUFC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYFI has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BUFC (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFI dropped -6.34% vs BUFC's -8.29%.
On 1-year performance, BUFC leads with 8.86% vs 7.81% for HYFI. On fees, HYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BUFC has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUFC has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFC.
HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.00% for BUFC.
HYFI is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BUFC is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYFI and 0.69% for BUFC.
BUFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYFI and BUFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer