PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYFI vs. BUFC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYFI vs. BUFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYFI achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly lower than BUFC's 2.84% return.


HYFI

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.21%
1Y
7.81%
3Y*
9.12%
5Y*
10Y*

BUFC

1D
0.02%
1M
1.58%
YTD
2.84%
6M
3.28%
1Y
8.86%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYFI vs. BUFC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
1.95%8.91%7.98%1.03%
BUFC
AB Conservative Buffer ETF
2.84%5.50%10.81%0.47%

Correlation

The correlation between HYFI and BUFC is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.51

The correlation between HYFI and BUFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

HYFI vs. BUFC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYFI
BUFC

Communication Services

80.8%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
10.1%

Energy

0.2%
3.4%

Basic Materials

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Financial Services

-

12.5%

Healthcare

-

9.6%

Industrials

-

8.6%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

-

33.6%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Communication Services

HYFI
80.8%
BUFC
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HYFI
19.0%
BUFC
10.1%

Energy

HYFI
0.2%
BUFC
3.4%

Basic Materials

HYFI

-

BUFC
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

HYFI

-

BUFC
5.3%

Financial Services

HYFI

-

BUFC
12.5%

Healthcare

HYFI

-

BUFC
9.6%

Industrials

HYFI

-

BUFC
8.6%

Real Estate

HYFI

-

BUFC
2.0%

Technology

HYFI

-

BUFC
33.6%

Utilities

HYFI

-

BUFC
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYFI vs. BUFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFI
HYFI Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HYFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFC
BUFC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BUFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFI vs. BUFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) and AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYFIBUFCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.40

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.46

+0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.18

10.49

+3.69

HYFI vs. BUFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the BUFC Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFI and BUFC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYFIBUFCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

2.09

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

1.42

+0.28

Drawdowns

HYFI vs. BUFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFI drawdown since its inception was -6.34%, smaller than the maximum BUFC drawdown of -8.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFI and BUFC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYFIBUFCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.34%

-8.29%

+1.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.49%

-3.62%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.12%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.51%

-0.76%

+0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.85%

-0.30%

Volatility

HYFI vs. BUFC - Volatility Comparison

AB High Yield ETF (HYFI) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to AB Conservative Buffer ETF (BUFC) at 0.98%. This indicates that HYFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYFIBUFCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.98%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.10%

3.36%

-0.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

4.25%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.64%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.36%

5.64%

-0.28%

HYFI vs. BUFC - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYFI vs. BUFC - Dividend Comparison

HYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, while BUFC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BUFC
AB Conservative Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HYFI
AB High Yield ETF
6.64%6.66%6.57%4.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYFI and BUFC have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYFI has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to BUFC (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYFI dropped -6.34% vs BUFC's -8.29%.

On 1-year performance, BUFC leads with 8.86% vs 7.81% for HYFI. On fees, HYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BUFC has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUFC has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 7.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFC.

HYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.64%, compared with 0.00% for BUFC.

HYFI is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while BUFC is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYFI and 0.69% for BUFC.

BUFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYFI and BUFC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer