PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
-1.96%9.60%5.20%10.21%-13.83%5.51%8.98%12.43%-5.11%8.98%
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
-0.90%7.88%9.75%11.86%-10.51%5.06%4.75%10.44%-0.54%4.97%
Different Trading Currencies

HYFA.L is traded in USD, while JNKS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the JNKS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYFA.L achieves a -1.96% return, which is significantly lower than JNKS.L's -0.90% return.


HYFA.L

1D
0.96%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
-1.96%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
5.35%
3Y*
6.92%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*

JNKS.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
-0.90%
6M
-0.14%
1Y
5.86%
3Y*
8.53%
5Y*
3.93%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYFA.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than JNKS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYFA.L
HYFA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

JNKS.L
JNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYFA.LJNKS.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

1.19

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.17

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.98

1.25

-0.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.26

6.07

-1.80

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYFA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is comparable to the JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYFA.L and JNKS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYFA.LJNKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

0.85

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.54

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.58

-0.08

Correlation

The correlation between HYFA.L and JNKS.L is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

HYFA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.75%, less than JNKS.L's 7.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYFA.L
Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist
6.75%6.57%7.05%6.73%5.78%4.63%5.86%6.08%6.19%5.46%1.22%0.00%
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
7.29%7.46%7.06%6.78%5.43%5.30%5.84%5.85%4.96%6.39%4.98%5.29%

Drawdowns

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYFA.L drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than JNKS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYFA.L and JNKS.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HYFA.LJNKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-14.18%

-15.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.33%

-4.74%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.97%

-10.35%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-3.03%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-3.67%

-0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.22%

1.50%

-0.28%

Volatility

HYFA.L vs. JNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Dist (HYFA.L) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) at 2.07%. This indicates that HYFA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HYFA.LJNKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

2.07%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

3.90%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.44%

6.91%

-0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.35%

7.22%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.55%

7.50%

+1.05%