HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L
HYEM.L (VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and SDIA.L (iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - HYEM.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while SDIA.L is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYEM.L returned 2.77%/yr vs 2.49%/yr for SDIA.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYEM.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SDIA.L.
Performance
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYEM.L achieves a 3.56% return, which is significantly higher than SDIA.L's 1.11% return.
HYEM.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 3.56%
- 1Y
- 7.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SDIA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.49%
- 10Y*
- —
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 3.56% | 8.98% | 11.89% | 7.56% | -12.87% | -0.65% | 5.46% | 14.61% | -1.96% |
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.11% | 6.22% | 4.94% | 5.68% | -4.49% | -0.70% | 4.50% | 6.15% | 1.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYEM.L and SDIA.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between HYEM.L and SDIA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.25 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L — Risk / Return Rank
HYEM.L
SDIA.L
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYEM.L) and iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYEM.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 3.54 | -0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.12 | 13.59 | -3.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYEM.L drawdown since its inception was -27.28%, which is greater than SDIA.L's maximum drawdown of -12.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYEM.L and SDIA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYEM.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.28% | -12.55% | -14.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -1.10% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.27% | -1.32% | -2.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.28% | -7.61% | -19.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | -0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.09% | -1.15% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.29% | +0.49% |
Volatility
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HYEM.L) has a higher volatility of 1.12% compared to iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (SDIA.L) at 0.73%. This indicates that HYEM.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDIA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYEM.L | SDIA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.12% | 0.73% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.12% | 1.81% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.94% | 2.21% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.98% | 2.78% | +4.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.23% | 3.50% | +3.73% |
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYEM.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SDIA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYEM.L vs. SDIA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither HYEM.L nor SDIA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYEM.L VanEck Emerging Markets High Yield Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% |
SDIA.L iShares USD Short Duration Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYEM.L and SDIA.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SDIA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SDIA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for HYEM.L.
HYEM.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SDIA.L is Corporate Bonds. HYEM.L tracks ICE BofAML Diversified High Yield US Emerging Markets Corporate Plus Index, while SDIA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for HYEM.L and 0.20% for SDIA.L.
Find the right allocation for HYEM.L and SDIA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer