HYDW vs. MYHA
HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and MYHA (State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYDW is passively managed, while MYHA is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. HYDW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for MYHA.
Performance
HYDW vs. MYHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HYDW
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 1Y
- 4.84%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.05%
MYHA
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $180.24K | $133.68K | $152.32K | |
| $598.17 | $732.34 | $5.19K |
HYDW vs. MYHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 0.86% |
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and MYHA is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2026 | 0.87 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. MYHA — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
MYHA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYDW vs. MYHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (MYHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HYDW | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.33 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.10 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. MYHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than MYHA's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and MYHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -0.69% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.86% | -0.10% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility
HYDW vs. MYHA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | MYHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87% | 1.73% | +1.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 1.73% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 1.73% | +5.20% |
HYDW vs. MYHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MYHA's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDW vs. MYHA - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than MYHA's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.75% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% |
MYHA State Street My2027 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 2.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDW and MYHA have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYDW is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYDW is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MYHA.
HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 2.06% for MYHA.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.39% for MYHA.
Find the right allocation for HYDW and MYHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer