HYDW vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYDW is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. HYDW is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. Over the past year, HYDW returned 5.43% vs 3.96% for CSHP. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

HYDW vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.86% return.

HYDW

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 6M: 1.45%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 7.32%
• 5Y*: 3.54%
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.86%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 3.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDW vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF	1.25%	8.47%	1.76%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.86%	4.10%	2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDW and CSHP is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2024	-0.08

The correlation between HYDW and CSHP shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

HYDW vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDW

HYDW Risk / Return Rank: 61
HYDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
HYDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
HYDW Omega Ratio Rank: 63
HYDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
HYDW Martin Ratio Rank: 69

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDW vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HYDW	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	11.22	-9.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	28.31	-25.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	6.67	-5.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.61	65.84	-63.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.38	395.75	-383.37

HYDW vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDW Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDW and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HYDW vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	HYDW	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.75%	-0.08%	-17.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.09%	-0.06%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	-0.01%	-0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.88%	-0.00%	-1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.01%	+0.43%

Volatility

HYDW vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) has a higher volatility of 0.67% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.15%. This indicates that HYDW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HYDW	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.67%	0.15%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.30%	0.27%	+2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.95%	0.36%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.41%	0.41%	+6.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.97%	0.41%	+6.56%

HYDW vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HYDW and CSHP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HYDW vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.73%, more than CSHP's 3.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.91%	5.39%	1.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF	5.73%	5.75%	5.35%	5.69%	4.78%	3.30%	4.45%	4.56%	4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HYDW and CSHP in my portfolio?

HYDW and CSHP have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HYDW or CSHP?

HYDW has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to CSHP (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDW dropped -17.75% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

Which ETF is better, HYDW or CSHP?

On 1-year performance, HYDW leads with 5.43% vs 3.96% for CSHP. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HYDW or CSHP?

Over the 1-year period, HYDW has performed better with a 5.43% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HYDW or CSHP?

HYDW and CSHP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HYDW or CSHP?

HYDW has the higher dividend yield at 5.73%, compared with 3.91% for CSHP.

What is the main difference between HYDW and CSHP?

HYDW is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.22 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.