HYDW vs. BBHY
HYDW (Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF) and BBHY (JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - HYDW tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index while BBHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYDW returned 3.52%/yr vs 4.03%/yr for BBHY. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HYDW charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BBHY.
Performance
HYDW vs. BBHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDW achieves a 0.77% return, which is significantly lower than BBHY's 1.29% return.
HYDW
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 0.77%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.37%
- 3Y*
- 6.83%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
BBHY
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 6.84%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.03%
- 10Y*
- —
HYDW vs. BBHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 0.77% | 8.47% | 5.42% | 9.84% | -7.86% | 2.77% | 5.51% | 11.44% | -1.08% |
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.29% | 8.51% | 7.81% | 11.98% | -10.37% | 3.88% | 5.36% | 14.35% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDW and BBHY is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2018 | 0.85 |
The correlation between HYDW and BBHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDW vs. BBHY — Risk / Return Rank
HYDW
BBHY
HYDW vs. BBHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDW | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 2.89 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 12.98 | -0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDW | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.82 | 1.89 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.56 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.64 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
HYDW vs. BBHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDW drawdown since its inception was -17.75%, smaller than the maximum BBHY drawdown of -24.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDW and BBHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDW | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.75% | -24.98% | +7.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.09% | -2.37% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.64% | -5.00% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.68% | -15.32% | +2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.58% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.89% | -2.37% | +0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 0.53% | -0.09% |
Volatility
HYDW vs. BBHY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF (HYDW) is 0.74%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BBHY) has a volatility of 1.16%. This indicates that HYDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDW | BBHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | 1.16% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 2.89% | -0.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 3.65% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.40% | 7.26% | -0.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.99% | 7.53% | -0.54% |
HYDW vs. BBHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDW has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BBHY's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HYDW vs. BBHY - Dividend Comparison
HYDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than BBHY's 6.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBHY JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.97% | 7.24% | 7.18% | 6.49% | 5.92% | 4.06% | 4.73% | 4.99% | 5.02% | 4.81% | 1.42% |
HYDW Xtrackers Low Beta High Yield Bond ETF | 5.76% | 5.75% | 5.35% | 5.69% | 4.78% | 3.30% | 4.45% | 4.56% | 4.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDW and BBHY have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BBHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to HYDW (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDW dropped -17.75% vs BBHY's -24.98%.
On 5-year performance, BBHY leads with 4.03% vs 3.52% for HYDW. On fees, BBHY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, HYDW has been the lower-risk option at 0.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 3.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBHY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for HYDW.
BBHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.97%, compared with 5.76% for HYDW.
HYDW tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market Low Beta Index, while BBHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HYDW and 0.15% for BBHY.
BBHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDW and BBHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer