HYDR vs. RNRG
HYDR (Global X Hydrogen ETF) and RNRG (Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF) are both Alternative Energy Equities funds from Global X - HYDR tracks the Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net while RNRG tracks the Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HYDR returned 9.63%/yr vs 2.91%/yr for RNRG. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYDR charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for RNRG.
Performance
HYDR vs. RNRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 81.00% return, which is significantly higher than RNRG's 14.02% return.
HYDR
- 1D
- -10.38%
- 1M
- -10.89%
- YTD
- 81.00%
- 6M
- 55.00%
- 1Y
- 205.99%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RNRG
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 14.79%
- 1Y
- 37.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.91%
- 5Y*
- -3.31%
- 10Y*
- 3.99%
HYDR vs. RNRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 81.00% | 43.73% | -33.08% | -36.49% | -47.24% | -13.89% |
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | 14.02% | 29.61% | -22.00% | -12.82% | -15.30% | -3.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDR and RNRG is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.62 |
The correlation between HYDR and RNRG shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HYDR vs. RNRG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYDR
RNRG
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
HYDR
RNRG
Basic Materials
HYDR
RNRG
Consumer Cyclical
HYDR
RNRG
-
Technology
HYDR
RNRG
Energy
HYDR
RNRG
-
Communication Services
HYDR
-
RNRG
-
Consumer Defensive
HYDR
-
RNRG
-
Financial Services
HYDR
-
RNRG
-
Healthcare
HYDR
-
RNRG
-
Real Estate
HYDR
-
RNRG
-
Utilities
HYDR
-
RNRG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDR vs. RNRG — Risk / Return Rank
HYDR
RNRG
HYDR vs. RNRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDR | RNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.39 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.97 | 6.30 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.29 | 17.29 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDR | RNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76 | 2.35 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.28 | 0.05 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
HYDR vs. RNRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, which is greater than RNRG's maximum drawdown of -58.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and RNRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDR | RNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.28% | -58.79% | -30.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.76% | -5.95% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.32% | -35.23% | -35.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -52.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.44% | -32.53% | -25.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -64.20% | -24.45% | -39.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.71% | 2.16% | +10.55% |
Volatility
HYDR vs. RNRG - Volatility Comparison
Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 21.08% compared to Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF (RNRG) at 5.84%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDR | RNRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.08% | 5.84% | +15.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.49% | 12.34% | +25.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.25% | 15.96% | +39.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 20.11% | +27.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.45% | 19.68% | +27.77% |
HYDR vs. RNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RNRG's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDR vs. RNRG - Dividend Comparison
HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, more than RNRG's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF | 2.11% | 3.82% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RNRG Global X Funds Global X Renewable Energy Producers ETF | 1.32% | 1.50% | 1.48% | 1.44% | 1.15% | 1.10% | 3.16% | 2.97% | 5.22% | 4.14% | 5.02% | 3.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDR and RNRG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HYDR has higher volatility (21.08%) compared to RNRG (5.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDR dropped -89.28% vs RNRG's -58.79%.
On 3-year performance, HYDR leads with 9.63% vs 2.91% for RNRG. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, RNRG has been the lower-risk option at 5.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HYDR has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 2.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RNRG.
HYDR has the higher dividend yield at 2.11%, compared with 1.32% for RNRG.
HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net, while RNRG tracks Indxx Renewable Energy Producers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYDR and 0.65% for RNRG.
HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.76 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYDR and RNRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer