PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYDR vs. DBE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYDR vs. DBE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYDR achieves a 101.95% return, which is significantly higher than DBE's 79.04% return.


HYDR

1D
-3.90%
1M
2.47%
YTD
101.95%
6M
76.41%
1Y
232.59%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
10Y*

DBE

1D
-2.52%
1M
-6.01%
YTD
79.04%
6M
69.31%
1Y
81.31%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
19.05%
10Y*
11.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYDR vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
101.95%43.73%-33.08%-36.49%-47.24%-13.89%
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
79.04%-2.17%2.96%-12.14%33.77%9.35%

Correlation

The correlation between HYDR and DBE is -0.17, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.08

The correlation between HYDR and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.17 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYDR vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYDR
HYDR Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HYDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDR Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DBE
DBE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DBE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DBE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBE Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYDR vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYDRDBEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.39

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.87

5.67

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.50

11.08

+7.42

HYDR vs. DBE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYDR Sharpe Ratio is 4.32, which is higher than the DBE Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYDR and DBE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYDRDBEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.32

2.33

+1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.24

0.09

-0.33

Drawdowns

HYDR vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYDR drawdown since its inception was -89.28%, roughly equal to the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDR and DBE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYDRDBEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.28%

-86.69%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.76%

-14.41%

-15.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.32%

-23.89%

-46.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.63%

-32.03%

-21.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.20%

-57.30%

-6.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.64%

7.37%

+5.27%

Volatility

HYDR vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Hydrogen ETF (HYDR) has a higher volatility of 18.28% compared to Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) at 13.05%. This indicates that HYDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYDRDBEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.28%

13.05%

+5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.72%

30.97%

+4.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.22%

35.07%

+19.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.24%

29.41%

+17.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.24%

28.34%

+18.90%

HYDR vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYDR has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYDR vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison

HYDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than DBE's 2.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DBE
Invesco DB Energy Fund
2.16%3.86%6.32%3.87%0.75%0.00%0.00%1.79%1.67%
HYDR
Global X Hydrogen ETF
1.89%3.82%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYDR and DBE have a correlation of -0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYDR has higher volatility (18.28%) compared to DBE (13.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYDR dropped -89.28% vs DBE's -86.69%.

On 3-year performance, DBE leads with 22.41% vs 14.46% for HYDR. On fees, HYDR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, DBE has been the lower-risk option at 13.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DBE has performed better with a 22.41% return vs 14.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYDR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.

DBE has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.89% for HYDR.

HYDR is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while DBE is Oil & Gas. HYDR tracks Solactive Global Hydrogen Index - Benchmark TR Net, while DBE tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for HYDR and 0.78% for DBE.

HYDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.32 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYDR and DBE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer