HYDB vs. DADS
HYDB (iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF) and DADS (Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. HYDB is passively managed, while DADS is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYDB charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for DADS.
Performance
HYDB vs. DADS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYDB achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than DADS's 15.40% return.
HYDB
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 7.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.11%
- 5Y*
- 4.67%
- 10Y*
- —
DADS
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYDB vs. DADS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 1.32% | 3.21% |
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 15.40% | -3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYDB and DADS is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYDB vs. DADS — Risk / Return Rank
HYDB
DADS
HYDB vs. DADS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF (HYDB) and Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF (DADS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYDB | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.88 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.30 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYDB | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
HYDB vs. DADS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYDB drawdown since its inception was -21.58%, which is greater than DADS's maximum drawdown of -17.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYDB and DADS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYDB | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.58% | -17.07% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -1.90% | +1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -7.66% | +5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility
HYDB vs. DADS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYDB | DADS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.79% | 17.59% | -13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 17.59% | -10.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 17.59% | -9.83% |
HYDB vs. DADS - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYDB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DADS's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYDB vs. DADS - Dividend Comparison
HYDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than DADS's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DADS Digital Asset Debt Strategy ETF | 2.74% | 1.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYDB iShares High Yield Bond Factor ETF | 7.00% | 7.04% | 6.95% | 7.00% | 6.30% | 4.70% | 5.81% | 5.68% | 6.16% | 2.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYDB and DADS have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HYDB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HYDB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for DADS.
HYDB has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 2.74% for DADS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Alphabit. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HYDB and 1.04% for DADS.
Find the right allocation for HYDB and DADS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer