HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO
HYBR.TO (Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF) and ZPR.TO (BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. HYBR.TO is actively managed, while ZPR.TO is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HYBR.TO returned 8.33%/yr vs 8.10%/yr for ZPR.TO. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HYBR.TO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for ZPR.TO.
Performance
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBR.TO achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly lower than ZPR.TO's 6.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HYBR.TO having a 8.33% annualized return and ZPR.TO not far behind at 8.10%.
HYBR.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 5.51%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
ZPR.TO
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 6.11%
- 6M
- 7.64%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 19.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.10%
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBR.TO Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF | 5.51% | 17.73% | 27.83% | 6.98% | -15.95% | 26.17% | 5.51% | 0.63% | -10.44% | 17.19% |
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 6.11% | 18.58% | 26.58% | 7.21% | -17.66% | 23.77% | 6.00% | 2.10% | -9.86% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBR.TO and ZPR.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HYBR.TO and ZPR.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HYBR.TO
ZPR.TO
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) and BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBR.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.94 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.09 | 7.54 | +2.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 41.05 | 44.76 | -3.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBR.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.81 | 4.31 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.94 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.71 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.35 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPR.TO drawdown of -44.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBR.TO and ZPR.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBR.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -44.92% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.88% | -2.47% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.27% | -8.75% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.06% | -23.06% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.65% | -44.05% | -2.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -0.51% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.01% | -9.37% | +1.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.46% | 0.42% | +0.04% |
Volatility
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF (ZPR.TO) at 1.08%. This indicates that HYBR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBR.TO | ZPR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.89% | 1.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.48% | 2.71% | +1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.76% | 4.32% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.49% | 8.33% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.82% | 11.50% | +2.32% |
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBR.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPR.TO's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBR.TO vs. ZPR.TO - Dividend Comparison
HYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than ZPR.TO's 5.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBR.TO Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF | 4.55% | 4.31% | 4.24% | 5.28% | 5.56% | 3.94% | 5.14% | 4.78% | 4.26% | 3.70% | 4.28% | 4.34% |
ZPR.TO BMO Laddered Preferred Share Index ETF | 5.06% | 4.86% | 4.93% | 5.92% | 5.97% | 4.66% | 5.48% | 5.24% | 4.70% | 3.94% | 4.97% | 5.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBR.TO and ZPR.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZPR.TO is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPR.TO is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYBR.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYBR.TO and 0.45% for ZPR.TO.
Find the right allocation for HYBR.TO and ZPR.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer