PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBR.TO achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than XPF.TO's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, HYBR.TO has outperformed XPF.TO with an annualized return of 8.33%, while XPF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 4.08% annualized return.


HYBR.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.05%
YTD
5.51%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.87%
3Y*
20.20%
5Y*
7.93%
10Y*
8.33%

XPF.TO

1D
0.13%
1M
0.50%
YTD
2.80%
6M
3.61%
1Y
9.95%
3Y*
10.34%
5Y*
2.61%
10Y*
4.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HYBR.TO
Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF
5.51%17.73%27.83%6.98%-15.95%26.17%5.51%0.63%-10.44%17.19%
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
2.80%9.33%14.80%7.19%-19.48%11.51%5.34%8.88%-7.32%10.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBR.TO and XPF.TO is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013

0.28

The correlation between HYBR.TO and XPF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.29 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBR.TO
HYBR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XPF.TO
XPF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
XPF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYBR.TOXPF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.35

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.09

2.60

+7.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.05

9.36

+31.69

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the XPF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBR.TO and XPF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYBR.TOXPF.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

1.84

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.31

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.28

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.30

+0.11

Drawdowns

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBR.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than XPF.TO's maximum drawdown of -43.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBR.TO and XPF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBR.TOXPF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-43.52%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.88%

-3.84%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.27%

-7.54%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.06%

-24.67%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.65%

-43.52%

-3.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.25%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.77%

-3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.46%

1.07%

-0.61%

Volatility

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Volatility Comparison

Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF (HYBR.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.89% compared to iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XPF.TO) at 1.59%. This indicates that HYBR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBR.TOXPF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.89%

1.59%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.48%

4.24%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.76%

5.44%

+1.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.49%

8.52%

+1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

14.44%

-0.62%

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBR.TO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XPF.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBR.TO vs. XPF.TO - Dividend Comparison

HYBR.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, less than XPF.TO's 5.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYBR.TO
Global X Active Hybrid Bond and Preferred Share ETF
4.55%4.31%4.24%5.28%5.56%3.94%5.14%4.78%4.26%3.70%4.28%4.34%
XPF.TO
iShares S&P/TSX North American Preferred Stock Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
5.13%5.08%5.21%5.74%5.46%4.30%4.95%5.12%4.94%4.59%5.14%5.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBR.TO and XPF.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XPF.TO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XPF.TO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HYBR.TO.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HYBR.TO and 0.50% for XPF.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBR.TO and XPF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer