PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBI vs. TLTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBI vs. TLTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly higher than TLTI's 1.07% return.


HYBI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.21%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTI

1D
0.23%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.07%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
5.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBI vs. TLTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
1.70%6.97%-1.17%
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.07%4.31%-4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and TLTI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2024

0.42

HYBI vs. TLTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HYBI
TLTI

Technology

35.6%
35.6%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.8%

Communication Services

11.2%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
8.5%

Industrials

8.3%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.6%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

HYBI
35.6%
TLTI
35.6%

Financial Services

HYBI
11.8%
TLTI
11.8%

Communication Services

HYBI
11.2%
TLTI
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

HYBI
10.1%
TLTI
10.1%

Healthcare

HYBI
8.5%
TLTI
8.5%

Industrials

HYBI
8.3%
TLTI
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

HYBI
4.9%
TLTI
4.9%

Energy

HYBI
3.6%
TLTI
3.5%

Utilities

HYBI
2.3%
TLTI
2.4%

Real Estate

HYBI
1.9%
TLTI
1.9%

Basic Materials

HYBI
1.8%
TLTI
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBI vs. TLTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTI
TLTI Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TLTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTI Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBI vs. TLTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYBITLTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.10

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

0.79

+4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.80

1.92

+14.88

HYBI vs. TLTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the TLTI Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and TLTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYBITLTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.56

+1.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

0.03

+0.96

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. TLTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum TLTI drawdown of -8.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and TLTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBITLTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-8.70%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-6.60%

+5.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-3.47%

+3.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-3.51%

+2.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

2.72%

-2.28%

Volatility

HYBI vs. TLTI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLTI) has a volatility of 2.76%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TLTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBITLTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

2.76%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

6.43%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

9.48%

-6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

11.14%

-6.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

11.14%

-6.21%

HYBI vs. TLTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than TLTI's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBI vs. TLTI - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than TLTI's 6.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.36%8.48%2.21%
TLTI
NEOS Enhanced Income 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
6.29%6.33%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBI and TLTI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLTI has higher volatility (2.76%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs TLTI's -8.70%.

On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 7.29% vs 5.19% for TLTI. On fees, TLTI is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TLTI is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.36%, compared with 6.29% for TLTI.

HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while TLTI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Neos and NEOS Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.58% for TLTI.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBI and TLTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer