PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBI vs. RISR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBI vs. RISR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 2.73% return.


HYBI

1D
0.13%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.70%
6M
2.21%
1Y
7.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RISR

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
2.73%
6M
4.18%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
10.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBI vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and RISR is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBI vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

RISR
RISR Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
RISR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RISR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
RISR Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
RISR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
RISR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBI vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HYBIRISRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.12

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

1.47

+3.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.80

3.47

+13.33

HYBI vs. RISR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the RISR Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and RISR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HYBIRISRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

0.70

+1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.99

1.23

-0.24

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum RISR drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and RISR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBIRISRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-14.31%

+9.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-2.61%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.76%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-2.18%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

1.11%

-0.67%

Volatility

HYBI vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBIRISRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

1.27%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

4.03%

-1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.22%

5.43%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

11.85%

-6.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

11.85%

-6.92%

HYBI vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBI vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than RISR's 5.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.36%8.48%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RISR
FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF
5.93%5.95%5.67%7.96%4.26%0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBI and RISR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RISR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs RISR's -14.31%.

On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 7.29% vs 3.80% for RISR. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.36%, compared with 5.93% for RISR.

They also come from different issuers: Neos and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 1.13% for RISR.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBI and RISR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer