HYBI vs. RISR
HYBI (NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF) and RISR (FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HYBI returned 7.29% vs 3.80% for RISR. At a correlation of -0.17, they often move in opposite directions. HYBI charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for RISR.
Performance
HYBI vs. RISR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.70% return, which is significantly lower than RISR's 2.73% return.
HYBI
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.70%
- 6M
- 2.21%
- 1Y
- 7.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RISR
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 2.73%
- 6M
- 4.18%
- 1Y
- 3.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.70%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYBI vs. RISR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 1.70% | 6.97% | -0.48% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 2.73% | 4.63% | 9.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBI and RISR is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | -0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBI vs. RISR — Risk / Return Rank
HYBI
RISR
HYBI vs. RISR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBI | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.12 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.13 | 1.47 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 3.47 | +13.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBI | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 0.70 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HYBI vs. RISR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum RISR drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and RISR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBI | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.68% | -14.31% | +9.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.43% | -2.61% | +1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -8.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.76% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -2.18% | +1.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.44% | 1.11% | -0.67% |
Volatility
HYBI vs. RISR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 0.98%, while FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RISR) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RISR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBI | RISR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 1.27% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.13% | 4.03% | -1.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 5.43% | -2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 11.85% | -6.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.93% | 11.85% | -6.92% |
HYBI vs. RISR - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than RISR's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBI vs. RISR - Dividend Comparison
HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than RISR's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBI NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF | 8.36% | 8.48% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RISR FolioBeyond Alternative Income and Interest Rate Hedge ETF | 5.93% | 5.95% | 5.67% | 7.96% | 4.26% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBI and RISR have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RISR has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to HYBI (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs RISR's -14.31%.
On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 7.29% vs 3.80% for RISR. On fees, HYBI is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 0.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBI is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for RISR.
HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.36%, compared with 5.93% for RISR.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and FolioBeyond. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 1.13% for RISR.
HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBI and RISR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer