PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HYBI vs. JBBB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HYBI vs. JBBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HYBI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than JBBB's 2.40% return.


HYBI

1D
0.09%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.72%
6M
1.74%
1Y
6.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

JBBB

1D
0.29%
1M
0.73%
YTD
2.40%
6M
2.48%
1Y
5.51%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HYBI vs. JBBB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
1.72%6.97%-0.53%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
2.40%4.40%2.97%

Correlation

The correlation between HYBI and JBBB is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2024

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HYBI vs. JBBB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HYBI
HYBI Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
HYBI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBI Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HYBI vs. JBBB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) and Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HYBIJBBBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.24

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

7.53

+6.59

HYBI vs. JBBB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HYBI Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the JBBB Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HYBI and JBBB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HYBI vs. JBBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HYBI drawdown since its inception was -4.68%, smaller than the maximum JBBB drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBI and JBBB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HYBIJBBBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-10.79%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-2.46%

+1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.23%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.61%

-1.69%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.44%

0.73%

-0.29%

Volatility

HYBI vs. JBBB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF (HYBI) is 1.27%, while Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that HYBI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JBBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HYBIJBBBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

1.37%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.35%

3.04%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.34%

3.54%

-0.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

5.21%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

5.21%

-0.28%

HYBI vs. JBBB - Expense Ratio Comparison

HYBI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than JBBB's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HYBI vs. JBBB - Dividend Comparison

HYBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%, more than JBBB's 6.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYBI
NEOS Enhanced Income Credit Select ETF
8.35%8.48%2.21%0.00%0.00%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
6.65%7.41%7.65%8.10%5.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


HYBI and JBBB have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBBB has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to HYBI (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBI dropped -4.68% vs JBBB's -10.79%.

On 1-year performance, HYBI leads with 6.27% vs 5.51% for JBBB. On fees, JBBB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HYBI has been the lower-risk option at 1.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HYBI has performed better with a 6.27% return vs 5.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBBB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for HYBI.

HYBI has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 6.65% for JBBB.

HYBI is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while JBBB is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for HYBI and 0.49% for JBBB.

HYBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HYBI and JBBB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer