HYBB vs. ACWI
HYBB (iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HYBB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA BB US High Yield Constrained Index (USD), while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HYBB returned 3.62%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for ACWI. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HYBB charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.
Performance
HYBB vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HYBB achieves a 1.31% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 12.13% return.
HYBB
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 6.73%
- 3Y*
- 7.86%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWI
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 12.96%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 21.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.28%
- 10Y*
- 12.85%
HYBB vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 1.31% | 8.95% | 6.35% | 10.53% | -10.11% | 3.36% | 4.29% |
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 12.13% | 22.41% | 17.45% | 22.27% | -18.39% | 18.66% | 11.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between HYBB and ACWI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2020 | 0.71 |
The correlation between HYBB and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
HYBB vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HYBB
ACWI
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
HYBB
ACWI
Basic Materials
HYBB
-
ACWI
Communication Services
HYBB
-
ACWI
Consumer Cyclical
HYBB
-
ACWI
Consumer Defensive
HYBB
-
ACWI
Energy
HYBB
-
ACWI
Healthcare
HYBB
-
ACWI
Industrials
HYBB
-
ACWI
Real Estate
HYBB
-
ACWI
Technology
HYBB
-
ACWI
Utilities
HYBB
-
ACWI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HYBB vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank
HYBB
ACWI
HYBB vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HYBB | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.06 | 2.29 | -0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 3.17 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.72 | 3.01 | -0.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.28 | 13.53 | -1.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HYBB | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.06 | 2.29 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.71 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.43 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
HYBB vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HYBB drawdown since its inception was -15.28%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HYBB and ACWI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HYBB | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.28% | -56.00% | +40.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.48% | -9.73% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.01% | -16.55% | +12.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.28% | -26.42% | +11.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.83% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -8.61% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 2.16% | -1.61% |
Volatility
HYBB vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF (HYBB) is 0.99%, while iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that HYBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HYBB | ACWI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 3.93% | -2.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.57% | 10.29% | -7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.28% | 12.78% | -9.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.93% | 16.05% | -9.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 17.11% | -10.44% |
HYBB vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HYBB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
HYBB vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison
HYBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than ACWI's 1.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF | 1.38% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 2.33% | 2.18% | 1.94% | 2.19% | 2.56% |
HYBB iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF | 5.87% | 6.08% | 6.22% | 6.28% | 5.04% | 3.86% | 0.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HYBB and ACWI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACWI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to HYBB (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HYBB dropped -15.28% vs ACWI's -56.00%.
On 5-year performance, ACWI leads with 11.28% vs 3.62% for HYBB. On fees, HYBB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYBB has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 11.28% return vs 3.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HYBB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.
HYBB has the higher dividend yield at 5.87%, compared with 1.38% for ACWI.
HYBB is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ACWI is Global Equities. HYBB tracks ICE BofA BB US High Yield Constrained Index (USD), while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HYBB and 0.32% for ACWI.
ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HYBB and ACWI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer