HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO
HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) and QUU.TO (Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXT.TO returned 14.31%/yr vs 16.35%/yr for QUU.TO. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.07% expense ratio.
Performance
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than QUU.TO's 10.24% return.
HXT.TO
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 31.46%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- 14.31%
- 10Y*
- 12.55%
QUU.TO
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 10.24%
- 6M
- 9.05%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.44%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- —
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 9.45% | 28.74% | 20.94% | 12.02% | -6.27% | 28.11% | 5.36% | 22.18% | -7.91% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 10.24% | 13.08% | 35.77% | 25.01% | -15.10% | 26.45% | 18.85% | 24.81% | -1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between HXT.TO and QUU.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018 | 0.56 |
The correlation between HXT.TO and QUU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Energy
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Basic Materials
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Technology
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Industrials
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Consumer Cyclical
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Consumer Defensive
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Utilities
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Communication Services
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Real Estate
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
Healthcare
HXT.TO
-
QUU.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HXT.TO
QUU.TO
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HXT.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.10 | 3.26 | +0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.03 | 12.12 | +6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HXT.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.31 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 1.07 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.90 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than QUU.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and QUU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HXT.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.13% | -26.86% | -25.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -8.81% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.36% | -19.23% | +6.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -24.00% | +7.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -2.47% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -4.42% | -14.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 2.37% | -0.71% |
Volatility
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.91%, while Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HXT.TO | QUU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 4.50% | -0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | 9.58% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 12.50% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.79% | 15.32% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 17.29% | -2.12% |
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HXT.TO and QUU.TO have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Dividend Comparison
HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QUU.TO Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.97% | 1.00% | 1.21% | 1.59% | 0.98% | 1.34% | 1.59% | 1.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HXT.TO and QUU.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXT.TO and QUU.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.
HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mackenzie.
Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and QUU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer