PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXT.TO achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly lower than QUU.TO's 10.24% return.


HXT.TO

1D
-1.77%
1M
2.42%
YTD
9.45%
6M
10.87%
1Y
31.46%
3Y*
22.24%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
12.55%

QUU.TO

1D
-2.47%
1M
2.83%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.05%
1Y
28.62%
3Y*
23.44%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
9.45%28.74%20.94%12.02%-6.27%28.11%5.36%22.18%-7.91%
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
10.24%13.08%35.77%25.01%-15.10%26.45%18.85%24.81%-1.07%

Correlation

The correlation between HXT.TO and QUU.TO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2018

0.56

The correlation between HXT.TO and QUU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HXT.TO
QUU.TO

Financial Services

37.3%
11.5%

Energy

15.9%
3.6%

Basic Materials

12.6%
1.8%

Technology

12.0%
35.3%

Industrials

8.9%
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.8%

Utilities

2.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
11.5%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.8%

Healthcare

-

8.8%

Financial Services

HXT.TO
37.3%
QUU.TO
11.5%

Energy

HXT.TO
15.9%
QUU.TO
3.6%

Basic Materials

HXT.TO
12.6%
QUU.TO
1.8%

Technology

HXT.TO
12.0%
QUU.TO
35.3%

Industrials

HXT.TO
8.9%
QUU.TO
8.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HXT.TO
3.9%
QUU.TO
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

HXT.TO
3.6%
QUU.TO
4.8%

Utilities

HXT.TO
2.9%
QUU.TO
2.3%

Communication Services

HXT.TO
2.4%
QUU.TO
11.5%

Real Estate

HXT.TO
0.5%
QUU.TO
1.8%

Healthcare

HXT.TO

-

QUU.TO
8.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QUU.TO
QUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) and Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HXT.TOQUU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.43

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.26

+0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.03

12.12

+6.91

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the QUU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXT.TO and QUU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HXT.TOQUU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.31

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

1.07

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.90

-0.64

Drawdowns

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXT.TO drawdown since its inception was -52.13%, which is greater than QUU.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXT.TO and QUU.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HXT.TOQUU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.13%

-26.86%

-25.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

-8.81%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

-19.23%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

-24.00%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.77%

-2.47%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-4.42%

-14.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.37%

-0.71%

Volatility

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO) is 3.91%, while Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU.TO) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that HXT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HXT.TOQUU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

4.50%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.58%

9.58%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

12.50%

-0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.79%

15.32%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

17.29%

-2.12%

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both HXT.TO and QUU.TO have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HXT.TO vs. QUU.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUU.TO
Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF
0.90%0.97%1.00%1.21%1.59%0.98%1.34%1.59%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


HXT.TO and QUU.TO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO and QUU.TO have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

HXT.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while QUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. HXT.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index, while QUU.TO tracks Solactive US Large Cap CAD Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Mackenzie.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXT.TO and QUU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer