PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HXS.TO (Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF) and QQCC.TO (Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HXS.TO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while QQCC.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Global X. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO returned 15.90%/yr vs 10.87%/yr for QQCC.TO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HXS.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for QQCC.TO.

Performance

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HXS.TO achieves a 11.99% return, which is significantly lower than QQCC.TO's 16.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HXS.TO has outperformed QQCC.TO with an annualized return of 15.90%, while QQCC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.

HXS.TO

1D
-0.27%
1M
7.20%
YTD
11.99%
6M
10.17%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
23.29%
5Y*
16.64%
10Y*
15.90%

QQCC.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
10.18%
YTD
16.94%
6M
14.76%
1Y
35.05%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
15.67%
10Y*
10.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF		11.99%11.93%34.98%23.22%-12.72%27.30%15.78%24.69%3.03%13.60%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		16.94%11.64%33.48%35.99%-8.51%7.92%-3.26%16.18%-15.89%18.77%

Correlation

The correlation between HXS.TO and QQCC.TO is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2011

0.50

Over the past year, HXS.TO and QQCC.TO have become more correlated (0.89) than their long-term average of 0.50, meaning their price movements have been converging.

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
HXS.TO
QQCC.TO

Technology

35.6%
50.5%

Financial Services

11.8%
0.2%

Communication Services

11.2%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.1%

Industrials

8.3%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
8.6%

Energy

3.5%
0.7%

Utilities

2.4%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.3%

Technology

HXS.TO
35.6%
QQCC.TO
50.5%

Financial Services

HXS.TO
11.8%
QQCC.TO
0.2%

Communication Services

HXS.TO
11.2%
QQCC.TO
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

HXS.TO
10.1%
QQCC.TO
12.6%

Healthcare

HXS.TO
8.5%
QQCC.TO
5.1%

Industrials

HXS.TO
8.3%
QQCC.TO
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

HXS.TO
4.9%
QQCC.TO
8.6%

Energy

HXS.TO
3.5%
QQCC.TO
0.7%

Utilities

HXS.TO
2.4%
QQCC.TO
1.5%

Real Estate

HXS.TO
1.9%
QQCC.TO
0.1%

Basic Materials

HXS.TO
1.8%
QQCC.TO
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF

Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF

Often compared with HXS.TO:
HXS.TO vs. HXQ.TOHXS.TO vs. VFV.TOHXS.TO vs. ZSP.TOHXS.TO vs. VOOHXS.TO vs. XUS.TOHXS.TO vs. SPYHXS.TO vs. TEC.TO
Often compared with QQCC.TO:
QQCC.TO vs. QQCL.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQC.TOQQCC.TO vs. QQQIQQCC.TO vs. QQQQQCC.TO vs. NVDA.TOQQCC.TO vs. XQQ.TOQQCC.TO vs. JEPQ.TO

Return for Risk

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
HXS.TO
HXS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO
QQCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) and Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

HXS.TOQQCC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.46
2.76

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.36
3.72

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.50

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

4.32

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

16.04

-3.42

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the QQCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXS.TO and QQCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

HXS.TOQQCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.76

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.90

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.63

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.00

+1.02

Drawdowns

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXS.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.42%, smaller than the maximum QQCC.TO drawdown of -36.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXS.TO and QQCC.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

HXS.TOQQCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.42%

-36.70%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.74%

-8.15%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.98%

-22.24%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-22.24%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

-36.70%

+9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-8.37%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.19%

+0.11%

Volatility

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF (HXS.TO) is 3.27%, while Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF (QQCC.TO) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that HXS.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

HXS.TOQQCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.27%

3.75%

-0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

10.03%

-1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.85%

12.78%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.13%

17.58%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.53%

17.29%

-0.76%

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXS.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQCC.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

HXS.TO vs. QQCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

HXS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HXS.TO
Global X S&P 500 Index Corporate Class ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQCC.TO
Global X NASDAQ-100 Covered Call ETF		10.48%11.27%9.89%11.85%11.04%5.15%5.84%6.31%7.90%6.01%6.73%8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

HXS.TO and QQCC.TO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXS.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXS.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

HXS.TO is categorized as S&P 500, while QQCC.TO is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for HXS.TO and 0.65% for QQCC.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HXS.TO and QQCC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer